Answer:
2.67 seconds
i dont have an explanation
Answer:
1) Motion of air mass moving from equator northward (closer to earth axis)
2) Motion of object in orbit
3) Collision of 2 objects
4) Skater changing rotation by extension of arms
5) Motion of rocket due to velocity of expelled gas
D.
All follow an elliptical path that has two foci, rather than a circular path.
Kepler found paths are elliptical, not circular
Well, first of all, one who is sufficiently educated to deal with solving
this exercise is also sufficiently well informed to know that a weighing
machine, or "scale", should not be calibrated in units of "kg" ... a unit
of mass, not force. We know that the man's mass doesn't change,
and the spectre of a readout in kg that is oscillating is totally bogus.
If the mass of the man standing on the weighing machine is 60kg, then
on level, dry land on Earth, or on the deck of a ship in calm seas on Earth,
the weighing machine will display his weight as 588 newtons or as
132.3 pounds. That's also the reading as the deck of the ship executes
simple harmonic motion, at the points where the vertical acceleration is zero.
If the deck of the ship is bobbing vertically in simple harmonic motion with
amplitude of M and period of 15 sec, then its vertical position is
y(t) = y₀ + M sin(2π t/15) .
The vertical speed of the deck is y'(t) = M (2π/15) cos(2π t/15)
and its vertical acceleration is y''(t) = - (2πM/15) (2π/15) sin(2π t/15)
= - (4 π² M / 15²) sin(2π t/15)
= - 0.1755 M sin(2π t/15) .
There's the important number ... the 0.1755 M.
That's the peak acceleration.
From here, the problem is a piece-o-cake.
The net vertical force on the intrepid sailor ... the guy standing on the
bathroom scale out on the deck of the ship that's "bobbing" on the
high seas ... is (the force of gravity) + (the force causing him to 'bob'
harmonically with peak acceleration of 0.1755 x amplitude).
At the instant of peak acceleration, the weighing machine thinks that
the load upon it is a mass of 65kg, when in reality it's only 60kg.
The weight of 60kg = 588 newtons.
The weight of 65kg = 637 newtons.
The scale has to push on him with an extra (637 - 588) = 49 newtons
in order to accelerate him faster than gravity.
Now I'm going to wave my hands in the air a bit:
Apparent weight = (apparent mass) x (real acceleration of gravity)
(Apparent mass) = (65/60) = 1.08333 x real mass.
Apparent 'gravity' = 1.08333 x real acceleration of gravity.
The increase ... the 0.08333 ... is the 'extra' acceleration that's due to
the bobbing of the deck.
0.08333 G = 0.1755 M
The 'M' is what we need to find.
Divide each side by 0.1755 : M = (0.08333 / 0.1755) G
'G' = 9.0 m/s²
M = (0.08333 / 0.1755) (9.8) = 4.65 meters .
That result fills me with an overwhelming sense of no-confidence.
But I'm in my office, supposedly working, so I must leave it to others
to analyze my work and point out its many flaws.
In any case, my conscience is clear ... I do feel that I've put in a good
5-points-worth of work on this problem, even if the answer is wrong .
In order to make his measurements for determining the Earth-Sun distance, Aristarchus waited for the Moon's phase to be exactly half full while the Sun was still visible in the sky. For this reason, he chose the time of a half (quarter) moon.
<h3 /><h3>How did Aristarchus calculate the distance to the Sun?</h3>
It was now possible for another Greek astronomer, Aristarchus, to attempt to determine the Earth's distance from the Sun after learning the distance to the Moon. Aristarchus discovered that the Moon, the Earth, and the Sun formed a right triangle when they were all equally illuminated. Now that he was aware of the distance between the Earth and the Moon, all he needed to know to calculate the Sun's distance was the current angle between the Moon and the Sun. It was a wonderful argument that was weakened by scant evidence. Aristarchus calculated this angle to be 87 degrees using only his eyes, which was not far off from the actual number of 89.83 degrees. But when there are significant distances involved, even slight inaccuracies might suddenly become significant. His outcome was more than a thousand times off.
To know more about how Aristarchus calculate the distance to the Sun, visit:
brainly.com/question/26241069
#SPJ4
