Answer:
a) Mo the electron configuration: 42Mo: 1s2 2s2 2p6 3s2 3p6 4s2 3d10 4p6 5s2 4d4
Mo3+ - is Paramagnetic
b) Au - [Xe] 4f14 5d10 6s1
For Au+ is not paramagnetic
c) Mn - [Ar] 3d5 4s2
Mn2+ is paramagnetic
d)Hf -[Xe] 4f¹⁴ 5d² 6s²
Hf2+ is not paramagnetic
Explanation:
An atom becomes positively charged when it looses an electron.
Diamagnetism in atom occurs whenever two electrons in an orbital paired equalises with a total spin of 0.
Paramagnetism in atom occurs whenever at least one orbital of an atom has a net spin of electron. That is a paramagnetic electron is just an unpaired electron in the atom.
Here is a twist even if an atom have ten diamagnetic electrons, the presence of at least one paramagnetic electron, makes it to be considered as a paramagnetic atom.
Simply put paramagnetic elements are one that have unpaired electrons, whereas diamagnetic elements do have paired electron.
Answer:
Explanation:cool thre answer is 009000000000.1 because you have to add them so ye
To get the ∆S of the reaction, we simply have to add the ∆S of the reactants and the ∆S of the products. Then, we get the difference between the ∆S of the products and the ∆S of the products. If the <span>∆S is negative, then the reaction spontaneous. If the otherwise, the reaction is not spontaneous.</span>
The question is incomplete.
You need two additional data:
1) the original volume
2) what solution you added to change the volume.
This is a molarity problem, so remember molarity definition and formula:
M = n / V in liters: number of moles per liter of solution
To give you the key to answer this kind of questions, supppose the original volumen was 1 ml and that you added only water (solvent).
The original solution was:
V= 1 ml
M = 0.2 M
Using the formula for molarity, M = n / V
n = M×V = 0.2 M × (1 / 10000)l = 0.0002 moles
For the final solution:
n = 0.0002 moles
M = 0.04
From M = n / V ⇒ V = n / M = 0.002 moles / 0.04 M = 0.05 l
Change to ml ⇒ 0.05 l × 1000 ml / l = 50 ml. This would be the answer for the hypothetical problem that I assumed for you.
I hope this gives you all the cues you need to answer similar problems about molarity.
