Answer:
The concentration of chloride ions in the final solution is 3 M.
Explanation:
The number of moles present in a solution can be calculated as follows:
number of moles = concentration in molarity * volume
In 100 ml of a 2 M KCl solution, there will be (0.1 l * 2mol/l) 0.2 mol Cl⁻
For every mol of CaCl₂, there are 2 moles of Cl⁻, then, the number of moles of Cl⁻ in 50 l of a 1.5 M solution will be:
number of moles of Cl⁻ = 2 * number of moles of CaCl₂
number of moles of Cl⁻ = 2 ( 50 l * 1.5 mol / l ) = 150 mol Cl⁻
The total number of moles of Cl⁻ present in the solution will be (150 mol + 0.2 mol ) 150.2 mol.
Assuming ideal behavior, the volume of the final solution will be ( 50 l + 0.1 l) 50.1 l. The molar concentration of chloride ions will be:
Concentration = number of moles of Cl⁻ / volume
Concentration = 150.2 mol / 50.1 l = 3.0 M
Answer:
Final concentration of C at the end of the interval of 3s if its initial concentration was 3.0 M, is 3.06 M and if the initial concentration was 3.960 M, the concentration at the end of the interval is 4.02 M
Explanation:
4A + 3B ------> C + 2D
In the 3s interval, the rate of change of the reactant A is given as -0.08 M/s
The amount of A that has reacted at the end of 3 seconds will be
0.08 × 3 = 0.24 M
Assuming the volume of reacting vessel is constant, we can use number of moles and concentration in mol/L interchangeably in the stoichiometric balance.
From the chemical reaction,
4 moles of A gives 1 mole of C
0.24 M of reacted A will form (0.24 × 1)/4 M of C
Amount of C formed at the end of the 3s interval = 0.06 M
If the initial concentration of C was 3 M, the new concentration of C would be (3 + 0.06) = 3.06 M.
If the initial concentration of C was 3.96 M, the new concentration of C would be (3.96 + 0.06) = 4.02 M
I think the answer is a, volume, but I still might be wrong.
Answer:
2.77532244 grams
Explanation:
Percent yeild=actual/theoretical * 100
Plug in the values
93.4452=actual/2.97 *100
0.934452*2.97=2.77532244
The correct answer is 33% i tried it on a lesson.
