All categories

3 years ago

Using newtons second law of motion, how fast for 100 KG object accelerates 350 N of force is applied to

Physics

1 answer:

fenix001 [56]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

3.5m/s^2

Explanation:

From Newton's second Law of Motion

F = ma

Where F is the applied force, m is the mass of the object and a is the acceleration.

F = 350 N

Mass = 100kg

350N = 100×a

a = 350/100

a = 3.5m/s^2

The acceleration of the object will be 3.5m/s^2

You might be interested in

You are on an airplane traveling 30° south of due west at 180 m/s with respect to the air. The air is moving with a speed 31 m/s

BlackZzzverrR [31]

1) 211m/s
2)240<span>°
3)759,600m or 759.6 km</span>

6 0

4 years ago

Jon and Jim push a dead car forward to the gas station. Jon pushes with 90N while Jim pushes 80 N.

Nina [5.8K]

The resultant of the two forces is about 170 N.

<h3>What is the resultant force?</h3>

The term resultant force has to do with the single force that has the same magnitude and direction as two or more forces acting together.

In this case, the both forces are acting in the forward direction. This implies that the resultant force is 90 N + 80 N = 170 N.

Learn more about resultant force:brainly.com/question/16380983

#SPJ1

5 0

2 years ago

A wave travels at a constant speed. How does the frequency change if the wavelength is reduced by a factor of 4

sweet-ann [11.9K]

The product of (wavelength) x (frequency) is always the same number ... the wave's speed.

So if the wavelength is somehow reduced to 1/4 its original length, the <em>frequency is immediately multiplied by 4</em> . That's the only way their product can remain the same.

4 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which of these is something whose construction MOST LIKELY would be determined by the government? A) An airport B) A golf club C

vesna_86 [32]

The answer is; A

Airports are usually controlled by governments because they are the points of entry and exit into a country and therefore should have enough security and customs. The vulnerability of the industry also from factors such as terrorism and weather requires that the government regulates the industry to protect the country's interests.

5 0

3 years ago

When blueshift occurs,the preceived frequency of the wave would be?

LiRa [457]

Answer:

When blueshift happens, the perceived frequency of the wave would be higher than the actual frequency.

Explanation:

As the name suggests, when blueshift happens to electromagnetic waves, the frequency of the observed wave would shift towards the blue (high-frequency) end of the visible spectrum. Hence, there would be an increase to the apparent frequency of the wave.

Blueshifts happens when the source of the wave and the observer are moving closer towards one another.

Assume that the wave is of frequency $f\; {\rm Hz}$ at the source. In other words, the source of the wave sends out a peak after every $(1/f)\; {\text{seconds}}$ .

Assume that the distance between the observer and the source of the wave is fixed. It would then take a fixed amount of time for each peak from the source to reach the observer.

The source of this wave sends out a peak after each period of $(1/f)\; {\text{seconds}}$ . It would appear to the observer that consecutive peaks arrive every $(1/f)\; {\text{seconds}}\!$ . That would correspond to a frequency of $f\; {\rm Hz}$ .

On the other hand, for a blueshift to be observed, the source of the wave needs to move towards the observer. Assume that the two are moving towards one another at a constant speed of $v \; {\rm m \cdot s^{-1}}$ .

Again, the source of this wave would send out a peak after each period of $(1/f)\; {\text{seconds}}$ . However, by the time the source sends out the second peak, the source would have been $v \cdot (1 / f) \; { \rm m}= (v / f)\; {\rm m}$ closer to the observer then when the source sent out the first peak.

When compared to the first peak, the second peak would need to travel a slightly shorter distance before it reach the observer. Hence, from the perspective of the observer, the time difference between the first and the second peak would be shorter than $(1/f)\; {\text{seconds}}$ . The observed frequency of this wave would be larger than the original $f\; {\rm Hz}$ .

6 0

3 years ago