Answer:
D. a triangle and a T-Square
Explanation:
A T-Square is the best drawing tool to create squares. You would need a squares to create cubes.
Answer:
McDonald’s announced recently that they are going through some major menu changes, and will be nixing some unnecessary ingredients. They also are finally listening to us, and will stop using chickens that are injected with growth-promoting antibiotics, along with dairy products raised with the growth hormone rbST but they still are using a lot of factory farmed meat and the beef is still raised with antibiotics.
McDonald’s even said they might add kale to their menu, by putting it in salads or in a smoothie. I LOVE kale, and I hope they don’t find a way to ruin it. You know the saying, “You can put lipstick on a pig, but it’s still a pig”. So, they need to do a lot more than just add kale to their menu before I’d ever eat there. The problem is that millions are still eating there and consuming several questionable food additives that McDonald’s could remove entirely if they really wanted to.
Explanation:
Answer:
The theoretical maximum specific gravity at 6.5% binder content is 2.44.
Explanation:
Given the specific gravity at 5.0 % binder content 2.495
Therefore
95 % mix + 5 % binder gives S.G. = 2.495
Where the binder is S.G. = 1, Therefore
Per 100 mass unit we have (Mx + 5)/(Vx + 5) = 2.495
(95 +5)/(Vx +5) = 2.495
2.495 × (Vx + 5) = 100
Vx =35.08 to 95
Or density of mix = Mx/Vx = 95/35.08 = 2.7081
Therefore when we have 6.5 % binder content, we get
Per 100 mass unit
93.5 Mass unit of Mx has a volume of
Mass/Density = 93.5/2.7081 = 34.526 volume units
Therefore we have
At 6.5 % binder content.
(100 mass unit)/(34.526 + 6.5) = 2.44
The theoretical maximum specific gravity at 6.5% binder content = 2.44.
Answer:
its so simple. u must mind some formulas.
Explanation:
mili->10^(-3)
micro->10^(-6)
nano->10^(-9)
so write the exact number and move "." to left or right depend question.
in this one:
23.5 is 23500000.0 nano with a default dot at the end
for turning to mili u must move the dot 6 steps to left so it will be: 23.5 milimeter.
Answer:
Accuracy and precision allow us to know how much we can rely on a measuring device readings. ±.001 as a "accuracy" claim is vague because there is no unit next to the figure and the claim fits better to the definition of precision.
Explanation:
Accuracy and Precision: the golden couple.
Accuracy and precision are key elements to define if a measuring device is reliable or not for a specific task. Accuracy determines how close are the readings from the ideal/calculated values. On the other hand, precision refers to repeatability, that is to say how constant the readings of a device are when measuring the same element at different times. One of those two key concepts may not fulfill the criteria for measuring tool to be used on certain engineering projects where lack of accuracy (disntant values from real ones) or precision (not constant readings) may lead to malfunctons and severe delays on the project development.
±.001 what unit?
The manufacturer says that is an accuracy indicator, nevertheless there is now unit stated so this is not useful to see how accurate the device is. Additionally, That notation is more used to refer to device tolerances, that is to say the range of possible values the instrument may show when reading and element. It means it tells us more about the device precision during measurments than actual accuracy. I would recommend the following to the dial calipers manufacturers to better explain its measurement specifications:
- Use ±.001 as a reference for precision. It is important to add the respective unit for that figure.
- Condcut test to define the actual accuracy value an present it using one of the common used units for that: Error percentage or ppm.
