1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Pavel [41]
2 years ago
10

Merchants usually sell small nuts, washers, and bolts by weight (like jelly beans!) rather than by individually counting the ite

ms. Suppose a particular type of washer weighs 0.110g on the average. What would 100 such washers weigh? How many washers would there be in 100. g of washers?
Chemistry
1 answer:
PolarNik [594]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

1. 11g

2. 909

Explanation:

To get the Weight of a 109 washers who weigh 0.110g each we have to find the ratio of Weight of one washer to 1 washer and multiply by 100

= 100 washers x 0.110g/1 washer

= 11g

Therefore the mass of 100 washers is 11 grams

2.

Then the number of washers =

100g x 1washer/0.110g

= 909

Therefore number of washers = 909

You might be interested in
What does climate and climate change mean to you and your life? <br><br> Pls help
Yuri [45]

Answer:

Climate change and climate dramaticlly affect my lifestyle and day to day life.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
How does the jet stream influence weather?
LiRa [457]
Jets streams play a key role in determining the weather because they usually separate colder air and warmer air.
4 0
3 years ago
Why are basic radicals classified into six groups?​
Alona [7]

Basic radicals (cations) have been divided into groups based on Ksp values

4 0
2 years ago
The table compares the number of electrons in two unknown neutral atoms.
Andrej [43]

Answer:

Both are highly reactive.

Explanation:

A has 1 valence electron D has 3

A is sodium D is aluminum

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
1s^2 2s^2 2p^6 3s^2 3p^6 how many unpaired electrons are in the atom represented by the electron configuration above?
Sedbober [7]
It's a combination of factors:
Less electrons paired in the same orbital
More electrons with parallel spins in separate orbitals
Pertinent valence orbitals NOT close enough in energy for electron pairing to be stabilized enough by large orbital size
DISCLAIMER: Long answer, but it's a complicated issue, so... :)
A lot of people want to say that it's because a "half-filled subshell" increases stability, which is a reason, but not necessarily the only reason. However, for chromium, it's the significant reason.
It's also worth mentioning that these reasons are after-the-fact; chromium doesn't know the reasons we come up with; the reasons just have to be, well, reasonable.
The reasons I can think of are:
Minimization of coulombic repulsion energy
Maximization of exchange energy
Lack of significant reduction of pairing energy overall in comparison to an atom with larger occupied orbitals
COULOMBIC REPULSION ENERGY
Coulombic repulsion energy is the increased energy due to opposite-spin electron pairing, in a context where there are only two electrons of nearly-degenerate energies.
So, for example...
↑
↓
−−−−−

↑
↓
−−−−−

↑
↓
−−−−− is higher in energy than
↑
↓
−−−−−

↓
↑
−−−−−

↑
↓
−−−−−
To make it easier on us, we can crudely "measure" the repulsion energy with the symbol
Π
c
. We'd just say that for every electron pair in the same orbital, it adds one
Π
c
unit of destabilization.
When you have something like this with parallel electron spins...
↑
↓
−−−−−

↑
↓
−−−−−

↑
↓
−−−−−
It becomes important to incorporate the exchange energy.
EXCHANGE ENERGY
Exchange energy is the reduction in energy due to the number of parallel-spin electron pairs in different orbitals.
It's a quantum mechanical argument where the parallel-spin electrons can exchange with each other due to their indistinguishability (you can't tell for sure if it's electron 1 that's in orbital 1, or electron 2 that's in orbital 1, etc), reducing the energy of the configuration.
For example...
↑
↓
−−−−−

↑
↓
−−−−−

↑
↓
−−−−− is lower in energy than
↑
↓
−−−−−

↓
↑
−−−−−

↑
↓
−−−−−
To make it easier for us, a crude way to "measure" exchange energy is to say that it's equal to
Π
e
for each pair that can exchange.
So for the first configuration above, it would be stabilized by
Π
e
(
1
↔
2
), but the second configuration would have a
0
Π
e
stabilization (opposite spins; can't exchange).
PAIRING ENERGY
Pairing energy is just the combination of both the repulsion and exchange energy. We call it
Π
, so:
Π
=
Π
c
+
Π
e

Inorganic Chemistry, Miessler et al.
Inorganic Chemistry, Miessler et al.
Basically, the pairing energy is:
higher when repulsion energy is high (i.e. many electrons paired), meaning pairing is unfavorable
lower when exchange energy is high (i.e. many electrons parallel and unpaired), meaning pairing is favorable
So, when it comes to putting it together for chromium... (
4
s
and
3
d
orbitals)
↑
↓
−−−−−
↑
↓
−−−−−

↑
↓
−−−−−

↑
↓
−−−−−

↑
↓
−−−−−

↑
↓
−−−−−
compared to
↑
↓
−−−−−
↑
↓
−−−−−

↑
↓
−−−−−

↑
↓
−−−−−

↑
↓
−−−−−

↑
↓
−−−−−
is more stable.
For simplicity, if we assume the
4
s
and
3
d
electrons aren't close enough in energy to be considered "nearly-degenerate":
The first configuration has
Π
=
10
Π
e
.
(Exchanges:
1
↔
2
,
1
↔
3
,
1
↔
4
,
1
↔
5
,
2
↔
3
,

2
↔
4
,
2
↔
5
,
3
↔
4
,
3
↔
5
,
4
↔
5
)
The second configuration has
Π
=
Π
c
+
6
Π
e
.
(Exchanges:
1
↔
2
,
1
↔
3
,
1
↔
4
,
2
↔
3
,
2
↔
4
,
3
↔
4
)
Technically, they are about
3.29 eV
apart (Appendix B.9), which means it takes about
3.29 V
to transfer a single electron from the
3
d
up to the
4
s
.
We could also say that since the
3
d
orbitals are lower in energy, transferring one electron to a lower-energy orbital is helpful anyways from a less quantitative perspective.
COMPLICATIONS DUE TO ORBITAL SIZE
Note that for example,
W
has a configuration of
[
X
e
]
5
d
4
6
s
2
, which seems to contradict the reasoning we had for
Cr
, since the pairing occurred in the higher-energy orbital.
But, we should also recognize that
5
d
orbitals are larger than
3
d
orbitals, which means the electron density can be more spread out for
W
than for
Cr
, thus reducing the pairing energy
Π
.
That is,
Π
W
5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which of the following should have the largest Henry's law constant (kH) in water?XeCl2COCO2CH3CH3
    13·1 answer
  • A lake that is protected from receiving the runoff from a cultivated field is likely to remain a healthy ecosystem. t or f
    13·2 answers
  • Within each energy level there are different sublevels that are created. Those electrons that have the lowest
    7·1 answer
  • What is the name of the compound Sr3N2?
    10·1 answer
  • Measurements show that the enthalpy of a mixture of gaseous reactants increases by 243.kJ during a certain chemical reaction, wh
    5·1 answer
  • To convert between moles and molecules, you need to...
    13·1 answer
  • Convert 256.3 g sodium carbonate to formula units
    14·1 answer
  • What percentage of carpet is calcium carbonates?
    14·1 answer
  • What is the criteria to place an element in a particular group?
    10·1 answer
  • Pick a key concept that you understand well and explain it in a way that an elementary school student could understand.
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!