Which explanation best identifies why the company in the following scenario has decided against investing in solar energy?

Engineering

1 answer:

pickupchik [31]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

The company found the cost of the required photovoltaic cells too expensive.

Explanation:

Solar energy can be used as an alternative source of supply for fuel. Solar energy is a renewable source of energy, that is it keeps on replenishing every day. Also solar energy does not require a lot of maintenance.

The cost required is starting a solar system is very high because one needs to buy solar panel, photovoltaic cells for batteries, inverters and so on.

From the question, the company decided against solar energy for the time being. This means that probably in the future they might consider it. Therefore it is as a result of the economic situation of the company that they have not set up a solar system because the cost of the required photovoltaic cells too expensive.

You might be interested in

The formula for the cross sectional area of specimen at the middle is

poizon [28]

Times the radius squared !

hope this helps :)))

8 0

3 years ago

Plz help me

Dmitrij [34]

As much as the human and physical capital in economy increases, there is a decrease in the marginal gain in economic growth that will diminish.

<u>Explanation:</u>

Low-income countries might have an advantage achieving greater worker productivity and economic growth in the future as their economic growth is faster than the high - income countries.

As much as the human and physical capital in economy increases, there is a decrease in the marginal gain in economic growth that will diminish. And this is called, the laws of diminishing returns.

Secondly, low - income countries find it easier in developing technologies than the high - income technologies especially countries like India and China.

High - income countries put effort in inventing new technologies, whereas low - income countries just improve and improvise their technology.

3 0

3 years ago

the velocity of a particle is given by v=16t^2i+4t^3j+(5t+2k) m/s, where t is in seconds. if the particle is at the origin when

pshichka [43]

Answer:

80.16 m/s^2

at t=2 s

x=42.3 m

y=16 m

z=14 m

Explanation:

solution

The x,y,z components of the velocity are donated by the i,j,k vectors.

$v_{x}=16t^{2} \\v_{y}=4t^{3}\\v_{z}=5t+2$

acceleration is a derivative of velocity with respect to time.

$a_{x}=\frac{d}{dt} v_{x}=\frac{d}{dt}[16t^{2}]=32t\\a_{y}=\frac{d}{dt} v_{y}=\frac{d}{dt}[4t^{3}]=12t^{2} \\a_{z}=\frac{d}{dt} v_{z}=\frac{d}{dt}[5t+2]=5$

evaluate acceleration at 2 seconds

$a_{x} =32*2=64m/s^{2}\\ a_{y} =12*2^{2} =48m/s^{2}\\a_{z} =5m/s^{2}$

the magnitude of the acceleration is the square root of the sum of the square of each component of the acceleration.

$=\sqrt{a_{x}^2 +a_{y}^2+a_{z} ^2 } \\=\sqrt{64^2 +48^2+5 ^2 }\\=80.16m/s^2$

position is the integral of velocity with respect to time position at a time can be found by taking by taking the definite intergral of each component.

$x=\int\limits {v_{x} } \, dx=\int\limits^2_0 {{16t^2} \, dt=42.7m\\\\y=\int\limits {v_{y} } \, dx=\int\limits^2_0 {{4t^3} \, dt=16m\\\\\\\\\\z=\int\limits {v_{z} } \, dx=\int\limits^2_0 {{5t+2} \, dt=14m\\\\$