This is a strange question, and f(x) may not even exist. Why do I say that? Well..
[1] We know that f(a+b) = f(a) + f(b). Therefore, f(0+0) = f(0) + f(0). In other words, f(0) = f(0) + f(0). Subtracting, we see, f(0) - f(0) = f(0) or 0 = f(0).
[2] So, what's the problem? We found the answer, f(0) = 0, right? Maybe, but the second rule says that f(x) is always positive. However, f(0) = 0 is not positive!
Since there is a contradiction, we must either conclude that the single value f(0) does not exist, or that the entire function f(x) does not exist.
To fix this, we could instead say that "f(x) is always nonnegative" and then we would be safe.
Answer:
yes
Step-by-step explanation:
any number is a difference
Whaen it says round to the nearest
There are 6 faces to the prism:
2 each of (Length x Width): 2(4 x 4) = 2(16) = 32 m²
2 each of (Length x Heighth): 2(4 x 8) = 2(32) = 64 m²
2 each of (Width x Heighth): 2(4 x 8) = 2(32) = 64 m²
The sum of the faces is the Surface Area (S.A.)
32 m² + 64 m² + 64 m² = S.A.
160 m² = S.A.
