The population will be 56,275 people.
You can see the picture for the formula.
Answer:
2.25 or 2 1/4 pounds
Step-by-step explanation:
if you add them all up (I converted them to decimals when adding) you get 13.5 or 13 1/2 if your using fractions, then you divide that by 6 because thats how many jars there are and you get 2.25 or 2 1/4
In order to solve this problem, use sign conventions. Since deposit indicates cash inflow, that would take the positive sign. On the other hand, withdrawals take negative sign. We add these integers to the original balance. he solution is as follows:
$100 + $25 + $50 + $15 + (⁻$40) =<em> $150</em>
<h3>
Answer: Choice B</h3>
No, this is not a plausible value for the population mean, because 5 is not within the 95% confidence interval.
====================================================
Explanation:
The greek letter mu is the population mean. It has the symbol
which looks like the letter 'u' but with a tail at the front or left side.
The question is asking if mu = 5 is plausible if the researcher found the 95% confidence interval to be 5.2 < mu < 7.8
We see that 5 is <u>not</u> in that interval. It's a bit to the left of 5.2
Since mu = 5 is not in the interval, it's not a plausible value for the population mean.
Have we ruled it out with 100% confidence? No. Such a thing is not possible. There's always room for (slight) error. The researcher would need to do a census to be fully confident; however, such practices are very time consuming and expensive. This is the main reason why statistics is important to try to estimate the population with a sample.
It is called a ray. Which is what you described