Answer:
There are many reasons to examine human cells and tissues under the microscope. Medical and biological research is underpinned by knowledge of the normal structure and function of cells and tissues and the organs and structures that they make up. In the normal healthy state, the cells and other tissue elements are arranged in regular, recognizable patterns. Changes induced by a wide range of chemical and physical influences are reflected by alterations in the structure at a microscopic level, and many diseases are characterized by typical structural and chemical abnormalities that differ from the normal state. Identifying these changes and linking them to particular diseases is the basis of histopathology and cytopathology, important specializations of modern medicine. Microscopy plays an important part in haematology (the study of blood), microbiology (the study of microorganisms including parasites and viruses), and more broadly in the areas of biology, zoology, and botany. In all these disciplines, specimens are examined under a microscope.
<em><u>hope</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>it</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>helps</u></em><em><u> </u></em>
Https://us-static.z-dn.net/files/d15/c111c5e1b23135c61adec7b554629964.jpg
I believe the answer is the third option. Hope this helps! Please tell me if I am wrong or if there was an error in my answer... also sorry this answer is late.
This problem is providing us with the molality of a solution of calcium iodide as 0.01 m. So the most likely van't Hoff factor is required and theoretically found to be 3 due to the following:
<h3>Van't Hoff factor:</h3>
In chemistry, the correct characterization of solutions also imply the identification of the ions it will release in aqueous solution. For that reason, the van't Hoff factor gives us an idea of this number, according to the formula the solute has got.
In such a way, for calcium iodide, we write its ionization equation as shown below:

Assuming it is able to ionize due to the low molality, because if it was higher, then it won't ionize. Hence, since we have three moles of ion products, one Ca²⁺ and two I⁻, we can conclude the van't Hoff factor would be 3, although calculations may lead to a different, yet close result.
Learn more about the van't Hoff factor: brainly.com/question/23764376
Answer:
<em>YOU</em> use <em>YOUR OWN WORDS</em>
Explanation:
Have a good day! :)