Answer:
3544
Step-by-step explanation:
This is a problem of compound growth. The formula is
Where F is the value in the future (in this case, the population after 13 years)
P is the intial amount (here, the initial population of 2000, so P = 2000)
r is the rate of growth (here, it is 4.5%, in decimal, 0.045)
t is the time frame (here, it is 13 years, so t = 13)
<em>we can plug the numbers into the formula and solve for F:</em>
<em>
</em>
<em>rounded to the nearest whole number, the </em><em>population after 13 years would be 3544</em>
Answer:
F(m) = -12
Step-by-step explanation:
Given the function:
When m = 4, we substitute the variable 'm' for the number 4:
F(m) = 256 - 384 + 80 + 40 - 4
F(m) = -12
![\bf \textit{difference and sum of cubes} \\\\ a^3+b^3 = (a+b)(a^2-ab+b^2) ~\hfill a^3-b^3 = (a-b)(a^2+ab+b^2) \\\\[-0.35em] \rule{34em}{0.25pt}\\\\ \boxed{a^6+b^6}\implies a^{2\cdot 3}+b^{2\cdot 3}\implies (a^2)^3+(b^2)^3 \\[2em] [a^2+b^2] [(a^2)^2-a^2b^2+(b^2)^2]\implies \boxed{(a^2+b^2)(a^4-a^2b^2+b^4)}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cbf%20%5Ctextit%7Bdifference%20and%20sum%20of%20cubes%7D%20%5C%5C%5C%5C%20a%5E3%2Bb%5E3%20%3D%20%28a%2Bb%29%28a%5E2-ab%2Bb%5E2%29%20~%5Chfill%20a%5E3-b%5E3%20%3D%20%28a-b%29%28a%5E2%2Bab%2Bb%5E2%29%20%5C%5C%5C%5C%5B-0.35em%5D%20%5Crule%7B34em%7D%7B0.25pt%7D%5C%5C%5C%5C%20%5Cboxed%7Ba%5E6%2Bb%5E6%7D%5Cimplies%20a%5E%7B2%5Ccdot%203%7D%2Bb%5E%7B2%5Ccdot%203%7D%5Cimplies%20%28a%5E2%29%5E3%2B%28b%5E2%29%5E3%20%5C%5C%5B2em%5D%20%5Ba%5E2%2Bb%5E2%5D%20%5B%28a%5E2%29%5E2-a%5E2b%5E2%2B%28b%5E2%29%5E2%5D%5Cimplies%20%5Cboxed%7B%28a%5E2%2Bb%5E2%29%28a%5E4-a%5E2b%5E2%2Bb%5E4%29%7D)
about the second one... well, is a "fait accompli" that using the pythagorean theorem, if x = 8 and y = 5, the hypotenuse must be √(8² + 5²) = √(89), which is neither of those choices.
5, 8, 13 are no dice, namely 5² + 8² ≠ 13
25, 64, 17 is are no dice too, because 25² + 17² ≠ 64²
however, 5,12 and 13 are indeed a pythagorean triple
also is 39, 80, 89.
when looking for a pythagorean triple, recall that c² = a² + b².
so the longest leg is the sum of the square of the small ones.
so what you'd do is, check the small legs, square them, add them up, if they're indeed a pythagorean triple, they "must" add up to the longest leg.
435 inches = 36 1/4 ft.
So, the answer would be D) 12 ft. 3 in. hope this helps
Answer: A − 9/7
Step-by-step explanation:
Hi, to answer this question we have to convert all the numbers into decimal form.
-3 1/3 = - (3x3+1)/3 =-10/3 = - 3.3334
-4/5 = -0.8
Since he number must greater than −3 1/3 but less than − 4/5.
−3 1/3 < x < − 4/5.
- 3.3334 < x < -0.8
The correct option is A = -9/7 , because in decimal form is equal to -1.28-
- 3.3334 < -1.28 < -0.8
