Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
the appropriate null and alternative hypotheses's are something
First. You have to look at what kind of proportionality it is.It is an Inverse Proportion.so you see the rate of change is 2.3
<span>A has earned twice as much as B so: A=2B
B has averaged 50% more than C so: B=C+0.5C
Combined is 220K, So A+B+C=220,000
The last equation can be re-written as:
2B+1.5C+C=220K
AND since A=2B, it can be rewritten again as:
3C+1.5C+C=220K
Now you can get C
finally, since B=1.5C you can get B, then to get the average, just divide that by 3 (years) and you should be done.
So B = 60000 for 3 years</span>
Ratios equivalent to 4:12 = 1:3
<u><em>The third one is correct.</em></u> You cannot figure it out from the parent function, |x|, because they are all the same. As a result, you have to figure it out from the y-intercept. The y-intercept of a function most of the time is the <em>constant</em> of the function. The y-intercept here is <em>0.5</em>. Using this, you can find the corresponding graph. That would be the <u><em>third </em></u><u><em /></u><em /> option.
Hope I helped! Happy New Year!
