1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
julia-pushkina [17]
3 years ago
10

I get 2 marks for this so plz answer. How many particles are in a 53.2 L volume of gas at STP?

Chemistry
1 answer:
exis [7]3 years ago
6 0

The number of particles= 1.43 x 10²⁴ particles

<h3>Further explanation</h3>

Given

53.2 L volume of gas at STP

Required

The number of particles

Solution

Conditions at T 0 ° C and P 1 atm are stated by STP (Standard Temperature and Pressure). At STP, Vm is 22.4 liters/mol.

So mol for 53.2 L :

= 53.2/22.4

= 2.375 moles

1 mol = 6.02 x 10²³ particles (molecules, atoms, ions)

The number of paricles for  2.375 moles gas :

= 2.375 x 6.02 x 10²³

= 1.43 x 10²⁴ particles

You might be interested in
HELP!!!
jek_recluse [69]

Answer:

Geothermal energy has a faster rate because a vast amount of heat energy is always present inside Earth's core.  

Geothermal energy has a slower rate because the water present below Earth's surface cools down periodically

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which statement about organic matter is false? A. Organic matter comes from organisms. B. Organic matter contains the element, c
siniylev [52]

B. Organic matter contains the element, carbon.


3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Draw the best Lewis structure for NH3 by filling in the bonds, lone pairs, and formal charges. (Assign bonds, lone pairs, radica
kiruha [24]

Answer :  The Lewis-dot structure of NH_3 is shown below.

Explanation :

Lewis-dot structure : It shows the bonding between the atoms of a molecule and it also shows the unpaired electrons present in the molecule.

In the Lewis-dot structure the valance electrons are shown by 'dot'.

The given molecule is, NH_3

As we know that hydrogen has '1' valence electron and nitrogen has '5' valence electrons.

Therefore, the total number of valence electrons in NH_3 = 5 + 3(1) = 8

According to Lewis-dot structure, there are 6 number of bonding electrons and 2 number of non-bonding electrons.

Now we have to determine the formal charge for each atom.

Formula for formal charge :

\text{Formal charge}=\text{Valence electrons}-\text{Non-bonding electrons}-\frac{\text{Bonding electrons}}{2}

\text{Formal charge on N}=5-2-\frac{6}{2}=0

\text{Formal charge on }H_1=1-0-\frac{2}{2}=0

\text{Formal charge on }H_2=1-0-\frac{2}{2}=0

\text{Formal charge on }H_3=1-0-\frac{2}{2}=0

Hence, the Lewis-dot structure of NH_3 is shown below.

3 0
3 years ago
Please help. Im not a very smart person
GenaCL600 [577]
Either it’s, it is released when the reaction is complete or it is changed into atoms of carbon and oxygen during the reaction
7 0
3 years ago
Scientists saw how well people responded to animals and imagined ___________ that these interactions might be helpful in some ty
sukhopar [10]

For most of the last 50 years, technology knew its place. We all spent a lot of time with technology—we drove to work, flew on airplanes, used telephones and computers, and cooked with microwaves. But even five years ago, technology seemed external, a servant. These days, what’s so striking is not only technology’s ubiquity but also its intimacy.

On the Internet, people create imaginary identities in virtual worlds and spend hours playing out parallel lives. Children bond with artificial pets that ask for their care and affection. A new generation contemplates a life of wearable computing, finding it natural to think of their eyeglasses as screen monitors, their bodies as elements of cyborg selves. Filmmakers reflect our anxieties about these developments, present and imminent. In Wim Wenders’s Until the End of the World, human beings become addicted to a technology that shows video images of their dreams. In The Matrix, the Wachowski brothers paint a future in which people are plugged into a virtual reality game. In Steven Spielberg’s AI: Artificial Intelligence, a woman struggles with her feelings for David, a robot child who has been programmed to love her.

Today, we are not yet faced with humanoid robots that demand our affection or with parallel universes as developed as the Matrix. Yet we’re increasingly preoccupied with the virtual realities we now experience. People in chat rooms blur the boundaries between their on-line and off-line lives, and there is every indication that the future will include robots that seem to express feelings and moods. What will it mean to people when their primary daily companion is a robotic dog? Or to a hospital patient when her health care attendant is built in the form of a robot nurse? Both as consumers and as businesspeople, we need to take a closer look at the psychological effects of the technologies we’re using today and of the innovations just around the corner.

Indeed, the smartest people in the field of technology are already doing just that. MIT and Cal Tech, providers of much of the intellectual capital for today’s high-tech business, have been turning to research that examines what technology does to us as well as what it does for us. To probe these questions further, HBR senior editor Diane L. Coutu met with Sherry Turkle, the Abby Rockefeller Mauzé Professor in the Program in Science, Technology, and Society at MIT. Turkle is widely considered one of the most distinguished scholars in the area of how technology influences human identity.

Few people are as well qualified as Turkle to understand what happens when mind meets machine. Trained as a sociologist and psychologist, she has spent more than 20 years closely observing how people interact with and relate to computers and other high-tech products. The author of two groundbreaking books on people’s relationship to computers—The Second Self: Computers and the Human Spirit and Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet—Turkle is currently working on the third book, with the working title Intimate Machines, in what she calls her “computational trilogy.” At her home in Boston, she spoke with Coutu about the psychological dynamics between people and technology in an age when technology is increasingly redefining what it means to be human.

You’re at the frontier of research being done on computers and their effects on society. What has changed in the past few decades?

To be in computing in 1980, you had to be a computer scientist. But if you’re an architect now, you’re in computing. Physicians are in computing. Businesspeople are certainly in computing. In a way, we’re all in computing; that’s just inevitable. And this means that the power of the computer—with its gifts of simulation and visualization—to change our habits of thought extends across the culture.



5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • An organic compound, X, will react with calcium metal to produce a salt with the empirical formula CaC4H4O4. What could be the i
    14·1 answer
  • As the density of a substance increases, the volume of a given mass of that substance__.
    6·2 answers
  • Help me fthffvghjhoun
    5·2 answers
  • What type of substance is always made up of a single type if atom
    8·1 answer
  • Pls help me 20 points ty
    11·2 answers
  • Which type of number is used to write the mole to mole ratio
    10·1 answer
  • In Latin, the word arthropod means jointed foot.
    10·1 answer
  • What does a positive cell voltage mean
    8·2 answers
  • HELP ME PLEASE I ONLY HAVE 14 MINUTES LEFT
    15·1 answer
  • Name the following compound:<br> CH₂-CH-CH₂ - CH₂ - CH3<br> 1<br> 2<br> CH₂<br> CH₂
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!