Answer:
Null hypothesis is: U1 - U2 ≤ 0
Alternative hypothesis is U1 - U2 > 0
Step-by-step explanation:
The question involves a comparison of the two types of training given to the salespeople. The requirement is to set up the hypothesis that type A training leads to higher mean weakly sales compared to type B training.
Let U1 = mean sales by type A trainees
Let U2 = mean sales by type B trainees
Therefore, the null hypothesis (H0) is: U1 - U2 ≤ 0
This implies that type A training does not result in higher mean weekly sales than type B training.
The alternative hypothesis (H1) is: U1 - U2 > 0
This implies that type A training indeed results in higher mean weekly sales than type B training.
Answer:
x4−5x3−6x2+26x+20
Step-by-step explanation:
(x−5)(x3−6x−4)
=(x+−5)(x3+−6x+−4)
=(x)(x3)+(x)(−6x)+(x)(−4)+(−5)(x3)+(−5)(−6x)+(−5)(−4)
=x4−6x2−4x−5x3+30x+20
=x4−5x3−6x2+26x+20
The answer to the problem is 127
Answer:
mok
Step-by-step explanation:
mok
