<span>Then, since the peak wavelength of the star Beta is 200nm, use Wein law and round 200 to the nearest WHOLE NUMBER. Hope that helps. </span>
Answer:
the claim is not valid or reasonable.
Explanation:
In order to test the claim we will find the maximum and actual efficiencies. maximum efficiency of a heat engine can be found as:
η(max) = 1 - T₁/T₂
where,
η(max) = maximum efficiency = ?
T₁ = Sink Temperature = 300 K
T₂ = Source Temperature = 400 K
Therefore,
η(max) = 1 - 300 K/400 K
η(max) = 0.25 = 25%
Now, we calculate the actual frequency of the engine:
η = W/Q
where,
W = Net Work = 250 KJ
Q = Heat Received = 750 KJ
Therefore,
η = 250 KJ/750 KJ
η = 0.333 = 33.3 %
η > η(max)
The actual efficiency of a heat engine can never be greater than its Carnot efficiency or the maximum efficiency.
<u>Therefore, the claim is not valid or reasonable.</u>
It’s because flourecent lights operate at higher temperatures than incadecent lights.
Friction between the ball and the floor is stealing some of the kinetic energy of the ball, and turning it into heat.
Step 2
step 5
step 4
step 6
step 1
step 3
thank me later
