All categories

2 years ago

Differentiate between velocity ratio and relative velocity in two points ??

1 answer:

4 0

The difference between velocity and relative velocity is that velocity is measured with respect to a reference point which is relative to a different point. While relative velocity is measured in a frame where an object is either at rest or moving with respect to the absolute frame.

You might be interested in

Being able to see a square in the middle of the image despite not having lines to form a square represents the Gestalt principle

vredina [299]

Answer: The correct answer for the blank is -

C. closure.

Gestalt principle of closure describes how we perceive complete figures even when the information that form the figure is missing.

This is due the fact that our brain responds to the familiar patterns inspite of getting incomplete information.

For instance, in the given question, we are able to perceive an image of square in the center despite not having actual lines that form a square.

Thus, it represents principle of closure.

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A solenoid of length 2.50 cm and radius 0.750 cm has 25 turns. If the wire of the solenoid has 1.85 amps of current, what is the

vfiekz [6]

Answer:

13.875 T

Explanation:

Parameters given:

Length of solenoid, L = 2.5 cm = 0.025 m

Radius of solenoid, r = 0.75 cm = 0.0075 m

Number of turns, N = 25 turns

Current, I = 1.85 A

Magnetic field, B, is given as:

B = (N*r*I) /L

B = (25 * 0.0075 * 1.85)/0.025

B = 13.875 T

4 0

3 years ago

The drawing shows a large cube (mass = 21.0 kg) being accelerated across a horizontal frictionless surface by a horizontal force

MaRussiya [10]

Answer:

The blocks must be pushed with a force higher than 359 Newtons horizontally in order to accomplish this friction levitation feat.

Explanation:

The first step in resolving any physics problem is to draw the given scenario (if possible), see the attached image to have an idea of the objects and forces involved.

The large cube in red is being pushed from the left by a force $\vec{P}$ whose value is to be found. That cube has its own weight $\vec{w}_1=m_1\vec{g}$ , and it is associated with the force of gravity which points downward. Newton's third law stipulates that the response from the floor is an upward pointing force on the cube, and it's called the normal force $\vec{N}_1$ .

A second cube is being pushed by the first, and since the force $\vec{P}$ is strong enough it is able to keep such block suspended as if it were glued to the first one, due to friction. As in the larger cube, the smaller one has a weight $\vec{w}_2=m_2\vec{g}$ pointing downwards, but the normal force in this block doesn't point upwards since its 'floor' isn't below it, but in its side, therefore the normal force directs it to the right as it is shown in the picture. Normal forces are perpendicular to the surface they contact. The final force is the friction between both cubes, that sets a resistance of one moving parallel the other. In this case, the weight of the block its the force pointing parallel to the contact surface, so the friction opposes that force, and thus points upwards. Friction forces can be set as $Fr=\mu~N$ , where $\mu$ is the coefficient of static friction between the cubes.

Now that all forces involved are identified, the following step is to apply Newton's second law and add all the forces for each block that point in the same line, and set it as equal its mass multiplied by its acceleration. The condition over the smaller box is the relevant one so its the first one to be analyzed.

In the vertical component: $\Sigma F^2_y=Fr-w_2=m_2 a_y$ Since the idea is that it doesn't slips downwards, the vertical acceleration should be set to zero $a_y=0$ , and making explicit the other forces: $\mu N_2-m_2g=0\quad\Rightarrow (0.710)N_2-(4.5)(10)=0\quad\Rightarrow N_2=(4.5)(10)/(0.710)\approx 63.38$ [N]. In the last equation gravity's acceleration was rounded to 10 [m/s $^2$ ].

In its horizontal component: $\Sigma F^2_x=N_2=m_2 a_x$ , this time the horizontal acceleration is not zero, because it is constantly being pushed. However, the value of the normal force and the mass of the block are known, so its horizontal acceleration can be determined: $63.38=(4.5) a_x \quad \Rightarrow a_x=(63.38)/(4.5)\approx 14.08$ [m/s $^2$ ]. Notice that this acceleration is higher than the one of gravity, and it is understandable since you should be able to push it harder than gravity in order for it to not slip.

Now the attention is switched to the larger cube. The vertical forces are not relevant here, since the normal force balances its weight so that there isn't vertical acceleration. The unknown force comes up in the horizontal forces analysis: $\Sigma F_x=P=m a_x$ , since the force $\vec{P}$ is not only pushing the first block but both, the mass involved in this equation is the combined masses of the blocks, the acceleration is the same for both blocks since they move together; $P=(21.0+4.5) 14.08\approx 359.04$ [N]. The resulting force is quite high but not impossible to make by a human being, this indicates that this feat of friction suspension is difficult but feasable.

4 0

3 years ago

the net force on a vehicle is accelerating at a rate of 1.5 milliseconds is 1800 Newtons. What is the mass of the vehicles neare

Goryan [66]

Answer:

The mass is 1200 kilograms

Explanation:

Because Force is equal to mass times acceleration (F=m×a)

F=m×a

1800N=?×1.5

1800÷1.5=1200

1800N=1200Kg×1.5

7 0

3 years ago

Suppose that a comet that was seen in 563 A.D. by Chinese astronomers was spotted again in year 1951. Assume the time between ob

Mars2501 [29]

Answer:

$a=2.77*10^{13}m$

$R_a=5.49*10^{13}m$

Explanation:

The period of the comet is the time it takes to do a complete orbit:

T=1951-(-563)=2514 years

writen in seconds:

$2514years*\frac{3,154*10^7s}{1year}=7.93 *10^{10}s$

Since the eccentricity is greater than 0 but lower than 1 you can know that the trajectory is an ellipse.

Therefore, if the mass of the sun is aprox. 1.99e30 kg, and you assume it to be much larger than the mass of the comet, you can use Kepler's law of periods to calculate the semimajor axis:

$T^2=\frac{4\pi^2}{Gm_{sun}}a^3\\ a=\sqrt[3]{\frac{Gm_{sun}T^2}{4\pi^2} } \\a=1.50*10^{6}m$

Then, using the law of orbits, you can calculate the greatest distance from the sun, which is called aphelion:

$R_a=a(1+e)\\R_a=2.77*10^{13}(1.986)\\R_a=5.49*10^{13}m$

8 0

3 years ago