The mass of this bag of cement in S.I. units (kg) is equal to 0.062 kilograms.
<u>Given the following data:</u>
- Mass of cement = 62 grams.
To calculate the mass of this bag of cement in S.I. units (kg):
<h3>How to convert to
S.I. units.</h3>
In Science, kilograms (kg) is the standard unit of measurement or S.I. units of the mass of a physical object. Thus, we would convert the value of the mass of this bag of cement in grams to kilograms (kg) as follows:
<u>Conversion:</u>
1000 grams = 1 kilograms.
62 grams = X kilograms.
Cross-multiplying, we have:
X = 
X = 0.062 kilograms.
Read more on mass here: brainly.com/question/13833323
Answer:
The bullet's initial speed is 243.21 m/s.
Explanation:
Given that,
Mass of the bullet, 
Mass of the pendulum, 
The center of mass of the pendulum rises a vertical distance of 10 cm.
We need to find the bullet's initial speed if it is assumed that the bullet remains embedded in the pendulum. Let it is v. In this case, the energy of the system remains conserved. The kinetic energy of the bullet gets converted to potential energy for the whole system. So,
V is the speed of the bullet and pendulum at the time of collision
Now using conservation of momentum as :
Put the value of V from equation (1) in above equation as :
So, the bullet's initial speed is 243.21 m/s.
Drawing is an easy way to connect to your inner child
Explanation:
Coefficient of kinetic friction is the resistive force that opposes the motion of a body as it moves and is in contact with another body.
It is found by dividing the frictional force by the normal force.
- Friction is a force that opposes motion.
- Static friction is for bodies that are not in motion
- Kinetic friction is for moving bodies.
There is no right or wrong answer, your teacher wants you to support your own answer with points. As long as the reasons make logical sense you are fine.
I think they both have valid points. Their replies are both true, but from a buyer's perspective who would you purchase services from? You would get different answers depending on who you ask.
If you choose to go old school, obviously you get an actual photo that can be stored physically. This means it is a memory that can be preserved, and it might feel more nostalgic being able to touch the photo.
On the other hand, a digitally stored photo can be altered (photoshop), but it is forever as long as the internet still exists. A physical photo would fade with time, which doesn't happen with a digital photo.
It is definitely easier to argue that digital photography has more advantages (they do, it is why nobody uses film anymore)
Points you can consider:
Can be transferred to the other side of the world instantly
Ability to make copies and print as many photos as you want
Can be stored on cloud/devices and be like that forever
Compare them with film photography to give a more solid response.
