Utilitarianism is a personal moral philosophy which id being used in this scenario.
<h3>What is Utilitarianism?</h3>
This is the morality that advocates actions that foster happiness or pleasure and maximizes wellbeing of individuals.
The manager believing that the benefits of a choice exceed the costs is ethicalk as result of her having more profit which will maximize the company' wellbeing.
Read more about Utilitarianism here brainly.com/question/2642866
Question options :
a. raise both private and public saving.b. raise private saving and lower public saving.c. lower private saving and raise public saving.d. lower private and public saving.
Answer:
c. lower private saving and raise public saving.
Explanation:
National saving is total of private and public saving minus the country's consumption and government expenditure.
Private saving is income from households minus consumption and taxes.
Formula for public saving is T − G − TR which is government budget surplus through revenue from tax. This is revenue from tax minus government expenditure and transfers.
Answer:
The correct answer is option A.
Explanation:
Sharon in consuming two goods X and Y.
The price of X is $2 and that of Y is $1.
The marginal utility derived from consuming X is 60 utils and from consuming Y is 30 utils.
For profit-maximization the ratio of marginal utility and price should be equal for both goods or the marginal utility of money spent on both goods should be equal.
The ratio for good X
= 
= 
= 30
The ratio for good Y
= 
= 
= 30
Since the ratio is same for both the goods it implies that Sharon is maximizing her total utility.
Answer: so when you think about it just know you can do it
Explanation:
12345678910
In
hypothesis testing, one can only positively prove something by disproving the
null hypothesis. I this case, the null hypothesis is that there is no
relationship between eating frozen pizza and dangerous cholesterol levels.
<span> A p
value of a statistical summary (such as the sample mean difference between two
compared groups) indicates the probability that the null hypothesis is true.
Generally, a p value < 0.05 is usually taken to be statistically
significant, i.e. a 5% chance that the null hypothesis is true. In this case,
the relationship was find to be non-significant.</span>
