I can't actually answer this one if the empirical formula is not given. Luckily, I've found a similar problem from another website. The problem is shown in the picture attached. It shows that the empirical formula is CH₂O. Let's calculate the molar mass of the empirical formula.
Molar mass of E.F = 12 + 2(1) + 16 = 30 g/mol
Then, let's divide this to the molar mass of the molecular formula.
Molar mass of M.F/Molar mass of E.F = 180/30 = 6
Therefore, let's multiply 6 to each subscript in the empirical formula to determine the actual molecular formula.
<em>Actual molecular formula = C₆H₁₂O₆</em>
<em>Same group element have same</em><em><u> Valence electron</u></em><em> and behave similarly in </em><em><u>Chemistry.</u></em>
<u>Explanation:</u>
For example. First group elements Alkali metals:- H, Li, K, Rb, Cs, Fr
Valance electron will take part in forming a bond with other elements and compound will form. All the above-given elements (H-Fr) have valence electron 1 in outer most 'S' shell. All have electronic configuration S1
Behavior: Since valence electrons are the same so the behavior of all the elements in this group is the same. All are metal (from Li-Fr, except Hydrogen), all are very reactive, does not found in native state in the environment, and all react with water.
Answer:
I'm pretty sure the answer is C.
Answer:
I believe the answer is D
Explanation:
C is not correct
Hi!
The reason for reviewing and replicating work of other scientists is influenced by two factors listed in the answer:
1. An experiment may have had errors that the scientist did not recognize. <u>(unintentional) </u>
2. The results of individual scientists may be influenced by bias. <u>(intentional)</u>
<em>Personal motivations may often influence a scientist to manipulate the results to best suit his/her hypothesis, consequently leading to scientific fraud. </em>
While other options listed are elements of the scientific method, they are not the reasons behind the review and replication of a scientist's work by others.
