All categories

3 years ago

Y= 2x+1 Graph this line

Mathematics

2 answers:

notsponge [240]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

i can't help you with the full graph but assume few values for x and then find y, then plot them in a graph

maksim [4K]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

look up desmos graphing calculator! you're welcome x

Step-by-step explanation:

You might be interested in

53/7 as a mixed number

marysya [2.9K]

Its already an improper fraction.
If you mean mixed number it would be 7 4/7.
Hope this helps!:)

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

In 24 hours one set of twins drank 16 bottles of formula. Each bottle holds 4 fl oz. How many cups of formula did the set of twi

aev [14]

Answer:

16 cups of formula

Step-by-step explanation:

you take 16 (the amount of bottles) and multiply it by 4 (the amount one bottle holds)

which gets you 64 then you multiply that by 2 ( the amount of children)

which gets you 128

then you divide by 8, because there are 8 fl oz in a cup

which gets you 16

16 cups of formula

7 0

3 years ago

Find the smallest relation containing the relation {(1, 2), (1, 4), (3, 3), (4, 1)} that is:

professor190 [17]

Answer:

Remember, if B is a set, R is a relation in B and a is related with b (aRb or (a,b))

1. R is reflexive if for each element a∈B, aRa.

2. R is symmetric if satisfies that if aRb then bRa.

3. R is transitive if satisfies that if aRb and bRc then aRc.

Then, our set B is $\{1,2,3,4\}$ .

a) We need to find a relation R reflexive and transitive that contain the relation $R1=\{(1, 2), (1, 4), (3, 3), (4, 1)\}$

Then, we need:

1. That 1R1, 2R2, 3R3, 4R4 to the relation be reflexive and,

2. Observe that

1R4 and 4R1, then 1 must be related with itself.
4R1 and 1R4, then 4 must be related with itself.
4R1 and 1R2, then 4 must be related with 2.

Therefore $\{(1,1),(2,2),(3,3),(4,4),(1,2),(1,4),(4,1),(4,2)\}$ is the smallest relation containing the relation R1.

b) We need a new relation symmetric and transitive, then

since 1R2, then 2 must be related with 1.
since 1R4, 4 must be related with 1.

and the analysis for be transitive is the same that we did in a).

Observe that

1R2 and 2R1, then 1 must be related with itself.
4R1 and 1R4, then 4 must be related with itself.
2R1 and 1R4, then 2 must be related with 4.
4R1 and 1R2, then 4 must be related with 2.
2R4 and 4R2, then 2 must be related with itself

Therefore, the smallest relation containing R1 that is symmetric and transitive is

$\{(1,1),(2,2),(3,3),(4,4),(1,2),(1,4),(2,1),(2,4),(3,3),(4,1),(4,2),(4,4)\}$

c) We need a new relation reflexive, symmetric and transitive containing R1.

For be reflexive

1 must be related with 1,

2 must be related with 2,

3 must be related with 3,

4 must be related with 4

For be symmetric

since 1R2, 2 must be related with 1,
since 1R4, 4 must be related with 1.

For be transitive

Since 4R1 and 1R2, 4 must be related with 2,
since 2R1 and 1R4, 2 must be related with 4.

Then, the smallest relation reflexive, symmetric and transitive containing R1 is

$\{(1,1),(2,2),(3,3),(4,4),(1,2),(1,4),(2,1),(2,4),(3,3),(4,1),(4,2),(4,4)\}$

5 0

3 years ago

Add the two expressions. −2.4n−3 and −7.8n+2

Sphinxa [80]

Answer:

-10.2n - 1

Step-by-step explanation:

We have two expressions in variable n and we have to add the two expressions.

An important thing to note is that only like terms can be added. i.e. the term with "n" can only be added or subtracted to the term with "n". Similarly a constant can only be added or subtracted to a constant.

$(-2.4n-3)+(-7.8n+2)\\=-2.4n-3-7.8n+2\\=-2.4n-7.8n-3+2\\=-10.2n-1$

Thus, the two given expressions add up to -10.2n - 1

4 0

3 years ago

This is a "water tank" calculus problem that I've been working on and I would really appreciate it if someone could look at my w

Sedaia [141]

Part A

Everything looks good but line 4. You need to put all of the "2h" in parenthesis so the teacher will know you are squaring all of 2h. As you have it right now, you are saying "only square the h, not the 2". Be careful as silly mistakes like this will often cost you points.

============================================================

Part B

It looks like you have the right answer. Though you'll need to use parenthesis to ensure that all of "75t/(2pi)" is under the cube root. I'm assuming you made a typo or forgot to put the parenthesis.

dh/dt = (25)/(2pi*h^2)
2pi*h^2*dh = 25*dt
int[ 2pi*h^2*dh ] = int[ 25*dt ] ... applying integral to both sides
(2/3)pi*h^3 = 25t + C
2pi*h^3 = 3(25t + C)
h^3 = (3(25t + C))/(2pi)
h^3 = (75t + 3C)/(2pi)
h^3 = (75t + C)/(2pi)
h = [ (75t + C)/(2pi) ]^(1/3)

Plug in the initial conditions. If the volume is V = 0 then the height is h = 0 at time t = 0
0 = [ (75(0) + C)/(2pi) ]^(1/3)
0 = [ (0 + C)/(2pi) ]^(1/3)
0 = [ (C)/(2pi) ]^(1/3)
0^3 = (C)/(2pi)
0 = C/(2pi)
C/(2pi) = 0
C = 0*2pi
C = 0

Therefore the h(t) function is...
h(t) = [ (75t + C)/(2pi) ]^(1/3)
h(t) = [ (75t + 0)/(2pi) ]^(1/3)
h(t) = [ (75t)/(2pi) ]^(1/3)

Answer:
h(t) = [ (75t)/(2pi) ]^(1/3)

============================================================

Part C

Your answer is correct.
Below is an alternative way to find the same answer

--------------------------------------

Plug in the given height; solve for t
h(t) = [ (75t)/(2pi) ]^(1/3)
8 = [ (75t)/(2pi) ]^(1/3)
8^3 = (75t)/(2pi)
512 = (75t)/(2pi)
(75t)/(2pi) = 512
75t = 512*2pi
75t = 1024pi
t = 1024pi/75
At this time value, the height of the water is 8 feet

Set up the radius r(t) function
r = 2*h
r = 2*h(t)
r = 2*[ (75t)/(2pi) ]^(1/3) .... using the answer from part B

Differentiate that r(t) function with respect to t
r = 2*[ (75t)/(2pi) ]^(1/3)
dr/dt = 2*(1/3)*[ (75t)/(2pi) ]^(1/3-1)*d/dt[(75t)/(2pi)]
dr/dt = (2/3)*[ (75t)/(2pi) ]^(-2/3)*(75/(2pi))
dr/dt = (2/3)*(75/(2pi))*[ (75t)/(2pi) ]^(-2/3)
dr/dt = (25/pi)*[ (75t)/(2pi) ]^(-2/3)

Plug in t = 1024pi/75 found earlier above
dr/dt = (25/pi)*[ (75t)/(2pi) ]^(-2/3)
dr/dt = (25/pi)*[ (75(1024pi/75))/(2pi) ]^(-2/3)
dr/dt = (25/pi)*[ (1024pi)/(2pi) ]^(-2/3)
dr/dt = (25/pi)*(1/64)
dr/dt = 25/(64pi)
getting the same answer as before

----------------------------

Thinking back as I finish up, your method is definitely shorter and more efficient. So I prefer your method, which is effectively this:
r = 2h, dr/dh = 2
dh/dt = (25)/(2pi*h^2) ... from part A
dr/dt = dr/dh*dh/dt ... chain rule
dr/dt = 2*((25)/(2pi*h^2))
dr/dt = ((25)/(pi*h^2))
dr/dt = ((25)/(pi*8^2)) ... plugging in h = 8
dr/dt = (25)/(64pi)
which is what you stated in your screenshot (though I added on the line dr/dt = dr/dh*dh/dt to show the chain rule in action)

8 0

3 years ago