Answer:
the answer is D
Explanation:
if you read the paragraph and question number 4 it tells you the answer wich is d
The data convincingly show that wave frequency does not affect wave speed. An increase in wave frequency caused a decrease in wavelength while the wave speed remained constant. The last three trials involved the same procedure with a different rope tension.
Answer:
Option B
Explanation:
Option A is the wrong answer because the horizontal vector is in the opposite direction.
Option C is the wrong answer as the horizontal vector is in the opposite direction and all the vectors are connected head to tail [of the arrows] [Triangle law of vector addition]
Option D is the wrong answer as the horizontal vector is in the opposite direction.
Answer:
a. 18.13m/s
b. 0.84m
c. 2.4m
Explanation:
a. to find the speed at which the ball was lunched, we use the horizontal component.Since the point distance from the base of the ball is 24m and it takes 2.20 secs to reach the wall,we can say that
t=distance /speed
Hence the speed at which ball was lunched is 18.13m/s
b. from the equation
the vertical distance at which the ball clears the wall is
y=8.14-7.3=0.84m
c. the time it takes the ball to reach the 6.2m vertically
the horizontal distance covered at this speed is
You will have to redefine the machine's boundaries.
