Answer:
Explanation:
Although there is absolutely NO regard for significant digits, I can help you with this, nonetheless.
The equation for Potential Energy is PE = mgh. We have everything but the height of the ball. We have to solve for that using a one-dimensional motion equation:
v² = v₀² + 2aΔx, where Δx is our displacement (the height we need for PE). Filling in and keeping in mind that at the max height of parabolic travel, the final velocity of the object is 0:
0 = (21.5)² + 2(-9.8)Δx and
0 = 462.25 - 19.6Δx and
-462.25 = -19.6Δx so
Δx = 23.58 m. Using this as the h in our PE equation:
PE = .19(9.8)(23.58) so
PE = 43.9 J, choice C.
Answer:
4
Explanation:
The weight of the rock is W = mg = (80 kg) (10 m/s²) = 800 N.
The mechanical advantage is therefore 800 N / 200 N = 4.
Ok, I think this is right but I am not sure:
Q = ϵ
0AE
A= π π
r^2
=(8.85x10^-12 C^2/Nm^2)
( π π (0.02m)^2)
(3x10^6 N/C) =3.3x10^-8 C = 33nC N = Q/e = (3.3x10^-8 C)/(1.60x10^-19 C/electron) = 2.1x10^11 electrons
Answer:
the second one!
Explanation:
the question is well, the question, a hypothesis is an educated guess on what you think will be the outcome
Answer:
The answer is "a, c and b"
Explanation:
- Its total block power is equal to the amount of potential energy and kinetic energy.
- Because the original block expansion in all situations will be the same, its potential power in all cases is the same.
- Because the block in the first case has no initial speed, the block has zero film energy.
- For both the second example, it also has the
velocity, but the kinetic energy is higher among the three because its potential and kinetic energy are higher. - While over the last case the kinetic speed is greater and lower than in the first case, the total energy is also higher than the first lower than that of the second.
- The greater the amplitude was its greater the total energy, therefore lower the second, during the first case the higher the amplitude.
