Answer:
the marketing mix variable—place
Explanation: this easy bc u just see what the variablie to the mix is times that
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
Billy's mom increases his weekly allowance by $ 55 . As a result, Billy increases the number of apps he downloads on his smartphone. 
If with increase in income demand increases, the good will be a normal good. Thus, apps that billy downloads are normal goods.
Susan gets a 15 percent performance bonus at work. She can finally stop eating so many frozen pizzas and eat something more tasty. Frozen pizzas are: Inferior goods
Here with increase in income, the demand for a commodity falls, the so called commodity is a inferior good. Thus, in this case frozen pizzas are inferior goods.
Mike is an appliance salesman. Refrigerator sales in his store have fallen and so has his commission. Mike decides to switch from name brand cereal to generic cereal. Generic cereal is: Inferior goods
If there is a fall in income and thus demand increases, the good is inferior. Thus, in this case generic cereal is an inferior good.
Hair stylist Molly loses a few of her clients. Molly cuts back on the number of smoothies she buys during the week. Smoothies are: Normal goods
If there is a decrease in income and thus demand falls, the good is normal. Thus, smoothies as commodity in this case will be refereed to as normal goods.
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
Predetermined manufacturing overhead rate= $9.8 per machine hour
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
 Machine-hours= 50,000
Manufacturing overhead= $490,000 
To calculate the predetermined manufacturing overhead rate we need to use the following formula:
Predetermined manufacturing overhead rate= total estimated overhead costs for the period/ total amount of allocation base
Predetermined manufacturing overhead rate= 490,000/50,000= $9.8 per machine hour
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
The correct answer is A. In Ricci v. DeStefano, the Supreme Court ruled that an employer may not simply disregard a test based on unwanted results unless the test is shown to be biased or deficient.
Explanation:
Ricci v. DeStefano is a Supreme Court ruling of 2009, after a lawsuit by nineteen firefighters who claimed to have been discriminated against in terms of career development.  They denounced that they had been discriminated after having passed the admission tests and still had not been promoted, since no African-American candidate had passed the tests. They also denounced that they had not been promoted because the Fire Department did not want to promote a group of new recruits without including within it any member of racial minorities.
Finally, the Supreme Court established that said procedure violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, since in the case equal access to employment was not guaranteed (in this case, favoring minorities over white firefighters), for set different demands for purely racial reasons.
 
        
             
        
        
        
<span>Good day! This is [insert name here]. I am interested in applying for a position with your company and I am calling to see if I can make an appointment with human resources to submit my resume. May I know who I should talk to regarding this? Thank you very much!</span>