Answer:
Here are a few:
1) The orbital radius of these planets is ridiculously small an in no way representative of their actual radii.
2) The planets will only line up like that once every 5200 years, making this very unrepresentative of their usual relations - although this does make their order in distance from the sun.
3) The nebulae, comet, lens flare, and other junk in the background is incorrect.
4) If this is meant as a representation of the planets, then Pluto should not be there as it is now considered a planetoid.
5) The planets are incorrectly scaled both to each other and to the sun.
........................z......
Kinetic Energy is movement energy (most simplistic way I can put it) so its motion.
I think it's 3. within an outer arm
let us consider that the two charges are of opposite nature .hence they will constitute a dipole .the separation distance is given as d and magnitude of each charges is q.
the mathematical formula for potential is 
for positive charges the potential is positive and is negative for negative charges.
the formula for electric field is given as-
for positive charges,the line filed is away from it and for negative charges the filed is towards it.
we know that on equitorial line the potential is zero.hence all the points situated on the line passing through centre of the dipole and perpendicular to the dipole length is zero.
here the net electric field due to the dipole can not be zero between the two charges,but we can find the points situated on the axial line but outside of charges where the electric field is zero.
now let the two charges of same nature.let these are positively charged.
here we can not find a point between two charges and on the line joining two charges where the potential is zero.
but at the mid point of the line joining two charges the filed is zero.