A) .was immediately accepted
Explanation:
The theory of plate tectonics was immediately recognized as the explanation for the moving continents. It provided a more scientific background as why continents drift apart and the seafloor keeps spreading.
- The theory explains that the earth is broken up into series of slabs called lithosphere which moves on the weak, ductile and fluid asthenosphere.
- The movement of part of the earth mantle provided the mechanism through which the lithosphere moves. This is now known as the mantle convection.
- This theory provided a scientific mechanism through which the plate moves and seafloor spreads.
- It was immediately accepted when the theory was propounded by Alfred Holmes in the 1930s
Learn more;
Continental drift brainly.com/question/5002949
#learnwithBrainly
Given the information available to us through the image provided, we can see that the rate at which Claire's small intestine breaks down the protein, lipids, and carbohydrates is lower than that of a healthy dog.
<h3>What does the graph tell us?</h3>
- The graph shows Claire's enzyme activity using a yellow line.
- The red line shows us a healthy dog.
- In each graph, the yellow line is lower than the red, indicating that Claire's enzyme activity is lower than normal.
Therefore, given that the graphs represent claire's ability to break down these substances using a yellow line that appears to be lower than the red line representing a healthy dog through each substance, we can confirm that Claire breaks them down at reduced rates.
To learn more about lipids visit:
brainly.com/question/233734?referrer=searchResults
Answer:
Alana put mailed 2 letters in each of the 3 mailboxes
Explanation:
D. not change is the answer
I would wait for a second opinion, because the question is phrased in such a way that is confusing.
None of the statements contain scientific evidence except for the last one, but the last statement is false.
If you were being scientifically accurate, you would answer the first statement as true and the rest false.
The second statement actually has evidence to back it up, but the evidence provided is incorrect.
