Yes, an object<span> that was set in motion in the past by some force, but that is no longer being acted on by a net force, is </span>moving<span> but with </span>zero acceleration<span>, i.e. it is </span>moving<span> at constant velocity.</span>
'A' and 'C' both show that behavior.
'D' also shows it, but the object is moving backwards when time begins.
First it moves faster and faster backwards, then it moves slower and slower backwards.
Answer:
Explanation:
We have the following data:
- distance covered by the child: d = 2 m (length of the slide)
- time taken to cover this distance: t = 3 s
- initial velocity of the child: 0 m/s (he starts from rest)
So we can find the acceleration by using the equation:
Where a is the acceleration.
Substituting the values and solving for a,
Answer:
dart
Explanation:
dart and sun and water so that the plant be okay
The way I do it is suddenly, in the same sort of way that magicians try to pull a table cloth off a table when there's things on the table cloth.The sudden approach acts as an impulse of force and starts to accelerate the roll. But, the piece (assuming it has perforations) is off the roll before the roll can move, due to inertia. Then the roll will acclerate, move, slow down and stop. However, in accelerating, the roll will unravel. The bigger the impulse the more it will unravel.+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++If on the other hand, the piece of paper is held firmly, and the roll is pulled, then the impulse is presumably given to the paper and the hand whose inertia is a lot more than that of the roll. So, I think I'd actually go for choice c)+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++This assumes that the roll is free to rotate.I think that a similar idea is behind the design and use of a "ballistic galvanometer". The charge is passed through the galvanometer quickly, as a current pulse. Then the needle starts to deflect, and the deflection is arranged to depend on the total charge that has passed through in the time of the current pulse.
