Radiation is s very powerful substance and can cause major health problems do the health care professionals limit the use to help not create sickness
Answer:
The given statement - The main criterion for sigma bond formation is that the two bonded atoms have valence orbitals with lobes that point directly at each other along the line between the two nuclei , is <u>True.</u>
Explanation:
The above statement is correct , because the sigma bond is produced by the head on overlapping, the orbitals should all point in the same direction.
<u>SIGMA BONDS -</u> Sigma bonds (bonds) are the strongest type of covalent chemical bond in chemistry. They're made up of atomic orbitals that collide head-on. For diatomic molecules, sigma bonding is best characterized using the language and tools of symmetry groups.
Head-on overlapping of atomic orbitals produces sigma bonds. The concept of sigma bonding is expanded to include bonding interactions where a single lobe of one orbital overlaps with a single lobe of another. Propane, for example, is made up of ten sigma bonds, one for each of the two CC bonds and one for each of the eight CH bonds.
Hence , the answer is true .
London Dispersion forces
Explanation:
London dispersion forces exists between the molecules of CO₂. These are weak attractions found between non-polar (and polar) molecules(symmetrical molecules).
- This attraction sometimes makes non-polar molecules polar.
- This is because of the uneven charge distribution caused by the constant motion of its electrons.
- A temporary dipole or instantaneous dipole induces the neighboring molecules to become distorted and forms dipoles as well.
- The forces are the weakest of all electrical forces.
Learn more:
Intermolecular forces brainly.com/question/10107765
#learnwithBrainly
A, because the number of valence shell electrons (outer shell electrons) tells us how much the element or compound wants to bond or give up electrons. Most compounds and elements want to have eight valence ectrons in it's outer ring. So if an atom is far away from having eight, it will want to react more often.
<span>there are a number of animals that eat frogs that will die off, then the animals that eat them will go hungry, and their populations will die off as well. This would just keep going up the food chain. Essentially, the loss of the frogs could have deep, reverberating effects that we may not grasp until it’s too late.</span>