<span>b) The force with a distance of 150 km is 889 N
c) The force with a distance of 50 km is 8000 N
This question looks like a mixture of a question and a critique of a previous answer. I'll attempt to address the original question.
Since the radius of the spherical objects isn't mentioned anywhere, I will assume that the distance from the center of each spherical object is what's being given. The gravitational force between two masses is given as
F = (G M1 M2)/r^2
where
F = Force
G = gravitational constant
M1 = Mass 1
M2 = Mass 2
r = distance between center of masses for the two masses.
So with a r value of 100 km, we have a force of 2000 Newtons. If we change the distance to 150 km, that increases the distance by a factor of 1.5 and since the force varies with the inverse square, we get the original force divided by 2.25. And 2000 / 2.25 = 888.88888.... when rounded to 3 digits gives us 889.
Looking at what looks like an answer of 890 in the question is explainable as someone rounding incorrectly to 2 significant digits.
If the distance is changed to 50 km from the original 100 km, then you have half the distance (50/100 = 0.5) and the squaring will give you a new divisor of 0.25, and 2000 / 0.25 = 8000. So the force increases to 8000 Newtons.</span>
Of the cliff?
Projectile motion
In the problem we are asked to find a height of certain cliff when a motorcycle stunt driver zoom out horizontally at the end the cliff at an initial velocity. So we will use one of the kinematics equation for projectile motion,
y
=
v
o
y
t
+
1
2
g
t
where
v
o
y
is just equal to zero since we can assume that the driver zooms out horizontally,
g
=
9.8
m
/
s
2
and
t
is time after
Answer:
Explanation:
Given
Weight of roller coaster is 
mass of roller coaster 
Distance traveled by roller coaster 
drag force 
velocity at top 
Suppose E is the initial energy
Conserving Energy at bottom and top


