The calculated coefficient of kinetic friction is 0.33125.'
The rate of kinetic friction the friction force to normal force ratio experienced by a body moving on a dry, uneven surface is known as k. The friction coefficient is the ratio of the normal force pressing two surfaces together to the frictional force preventing motion between them. Typically, it is represented by the Greek letter mu (). In terms of math, is equal to F/N, where F stands for frictional force and N for normal force.
given mass of the block=10 kg
spring constant k= 2250 Nm
now according to principal of conservation of energy we observe,
the energy possessed by the block initially is reduced by the friction between the points B and C and rest is used up in work done by the spring.
mgh= μ (mgl) +1/2 kx²
10 x 10 x 3= μ(600) +(1125) (0.09)
μ(600) =300 - 101.25
μ = 198.75÷600
μ =0.33125
The complete question is- A 10.0−kg block is released from rest at point A in Fig The track is frictionless except for the portion between point B and C, which has a length of 6.00m the block travels down the track, hits a spring of force constant 2250N/m, and compresses the spring 0.300m form its equilibrium position before coming to rest momentarily. Determine the coefficient of kinetic friction between the block and the rough surface between point Band (C)
Learn more about kinetic friction here-
brainly.com/question/13754413
#SPJ4
Answer:
a. 7.046 Nm²/C
b. 2.348 Nm²/C
Explanation:
Data given:
Base of equilateral triangle = 25.0 cm = 0.25 m
Strength of electric field = 260 N/C
In order to find the electric flux we first have to find out the area of triangle.
Area of triangle = 
= 
= 0.0271 m³
Lets find electric flux,
Electric Flux = E. A
= 260×0.0271
= 7.046 Nm²/C
Now we can find the electric flux through each of the three sides.
Electric flux through three sides = 
= 2.348 N m²/C
Easy !
Take any musical instrument with strings ... a violin, a guitar, etc.
The length of the vibrating part of the strings doesn't change ...
it's the distance from the 'bridge' to the 'nut'.
Pluck any string. Then, slightly twist the tuning peg for that string,
and pluck the string again.
Twisting the peg only changed the string's tension; the length
couldn't change.
-- If you twisted the peg in the direction that made the string slightly
tighter, then your second pluck had a higher pitch than your first one.
-- If you twisted the peg in the direction that made the string slightly
looser, then your second pluck had a lower pitch than the first one.
I don't think so as long as you make it apparent that the information comes the same source. So citing over and over again is unnecessary as long as it's clear that the information is from the same website or source. If you can't make it clear that they are from the same website source, it would a safe choice to continue to cite to avoid allegations of plagiarism.
to water at