Urban sprawl refers to the expansion of poorly planned, low-density, auto-dependent development, which spreads out over large amounts of land, putting long distances between homes, stores, and work and creating a high segregation between residential and commercial uses with harmful impacts on the people living in these areas and the ecosystems and wildlife that have been displaced. Although some would argue that urban sprawl has its benefits, such as creating local economic growth, urban sprawl has many negative consequences for residents and the environment, such as higher water and air pollution, increased traffic fatalities and jams, loss of agricultural capacity, increased car dependency, higher taxes, increased runoff into rivers and lakes, harmful effects on human health.
Hope this helps!
Answer:
Four abiotic forms of nitrogen cycle and its chemical formula
Ammonium – 
Ammonia – 
Nitrite –
Nitrate – 
Explanation:
Ammonium: In the nitrogen cycle ammonium is starting point that is present in soil and are converted to various forms by different process.
Ammonia: In the process of nitrogen fixation, the bacteria having nitrogenase enzymes reacts with the nitrogen as well as hydrogen and produces the ammonia, which is further converted to organic compounds.
Nitrite: The nitrosomonas bacteria present helps in conversion of nitrogen gas into nitrite.
Nitrate: Again the Nitrite is converted into Nitrate by the nitrobacter. During the process of assimilation ammonium and nitrate are absorbed by the plants.
Answer:
B. As the distance between loci increases, some multiple crossovers go undetected such that the relationship between recombination frequency and map distance ceases to be linear.
Explanation:
When calculating recombination frequencies, and hence, map distances, we might notice that these distances are not completely additive. They might vary. <em>For example, let us say that we have three genes, A, B, and C, in that order. </em>We calculated that the <em>distance between A and B equals 5.9</em> MU and that <em>B and C are 19.5 MU apart.</em> According to this, we might say that the <em>total distance between A and C is 25.4 MU (5.9 + 19.5). </em>However, after a<em> two-point calculation between A and C, the value equals 23.7 MU. </em>
The recombination frequency between these two genes located in the extremes and far apart underestimate the actual genetic distances between them because there might occur other crossing-overs that were not detected. This is <em>when calculating the distance between A and C, we probably will not detect the occurrence of a double recombinant between them, and hence, we might sub-estimate the real distance.</em>
The relationship between the actual map distance (number of crossing overs) and the recombination frequency between two loci, is not lineal. The farther apart are the two genes, the worse is the distance estimation.