1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
SpyIntel [72]
3 years ago
5

Henry mixed salt and water together in a cup until he observed a clear solution. He measured the mass of the solution. Then he p

laced the cup outside for several sunny days during the summer. After a week, he observed that only solid salt remained in the cup and the mass had decreased. Henry concluded that a physical and chemical change occurred in this investigation.
Which statements correctly defend or dispute his conclusion?

A- He is correct. Dissolving salt in water is a physical change, but evaporating the water is a chemical change. Formation of a solid is evidence that a chemical change occurred.
B- He is correct. Evaporation is a physical change, but dissolving salt in water is a chemical change. The change in mass is evidence that a chemical change occurred.
C- He is incorrect. Dissolving salt in water and evaporation of the water are both physical changes. The reappearance of salt is evidence that the change was reversible by a physical change, so it could not be a chemical change.
D- He is incorrect. Dissolving salt in water and evaporation of the water are both chemical changes. The reappearance of salt is evidence that the change was reversible by a chemical change, so it could not be a physical change.
Physics
2 answers:
Andrei [34K]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

B) He is correct. Evaporation is a physical change, but dissolving salt in water is a chemical change. The change in mass is evidence that a chemical change occurred.

Explanation:

hope this helps!! :)

Tomtit [17]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

B- He is correct. Evaporation is a physical change, but dissolving salt in water is a chemical change. The change in mass is evidence that a chemical change occurred.

Explanation: Dissolving Salt in water is a Chemical Change, Because the Salt arrangement is different in solid state than dissolved in water. As we can see in the image below, once the Salt is dissolved, it is separated into its ions, Na+ and Cl- Now, The evaporation process is a physical change, because the water doesn´t change its configuration H20 and it only changes its form, as we can see in the image below.

You might be interested in
State the relation between acceleration and momentum​
polet [3.4K]

Answer:

Acceleration is the rate of change in velocity. Momentum is the mass times the velocity. So if you multiply the mass times the acceleration, you get the of change of momentum.

8 0
3 years ago
A fox runs for 12 seconds at a speed of 9.65 m/s. How much distance does it cover? Exact answer, do NOT round.
Stella [2.4K]

Answer:

115.8

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
What's the name of the compound Kl?
Nat2105 [25]

Answer: Potassium iodide

Explanation: their you go

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
You use 8x binoculars were used on a warbler (14cm long) in a tree 18cm away. What angle (in degrees) does the image of the warb
mafiozo [28]

Answer:

The angle it subtend on the retina is  \theta_z = 0.44586^o    

Explanation:

From the question we are told that

     The length of the warbler is  L = 14cm = \frac{14}{100} = 0.14m

      The distance from the binoculars is    d = 18cm = \frac{18}{100} = 0.18m

        The magnification of the binoculars is  M =8

Without the 8 X binoculars the  angle made with the angular size of the object  is mathematically represented as

          \theta = \frac{L}{d}

        \theta  = \frac{0.14}{0.18}

           = 0.007778 rad

Now magnification can be represented mathematically as

         M = \frac{\theta _z}{\theta}

Where \theta_z is the angle the image of the warbler subtend on your retina when the   binoculars i.e the  binoculars zoom.

So

      \theta_z = M * \theta

=>    \theta_z =8 * 0.007778

            = 0.0622222224

Generally the conversion to degrees can be mathematically evaluated as

             \theta_z = 0.062222224 * (\frac{360 }{2 \pi rad} )

              \theta_z = 0.44586^o  

7 0
3 years ago
Un avión de pasajeros parte de un aeropuerto y toma la siguiente ruta: primero viaja desde un punto O hasta la ciudad A, localiz
notka56 [123]
Lu seenxhdkxksbdjkdbdjdiwjbsjsiisndj
5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is KE if mass = 5kg and velocity= 15m/s
    15·1 answer
  • If a gas at 25.0 °C occupies 5 liters at a pressure of 1.00 atm, what will be its volume at a pressure of 4 atm?
    12·1 answer
  • Hi, could someone please answer the first 3 questions of each planet
    15·1 answer
  • Changing the direction of current flow, will or will not affect the strength of an electromagnet? Pick one: Will or Will Not
    15·2 answers
  • PLEASE SEND GIVE THE ANSWER AS FAST AS POSSIBLE
    6·1 answer
  • Force acts on a pebble with position vector , relative to the origin. What is the resulting torque acting on the pebble about (a
    9·1 answer
  • The New England Merchants Bank Building in Boston is 152 m high. On windy days it sways with a frequency of 0.15Hz , and the acc
    6·1 answer
  • How many neutrons are in the nucleus of an atom with an atomic mass of 80 A.M.U. and an atomic number of 35?
    10·1 answer
  • What is accerlation ?​
    13·2 answers
  • The photograph shows a kettle made of the element copper. Which statement describes a chemical property of copper?
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!