Answer:
Yes, the velocity of the object can reverse direction when its acceleration is constant. For example consider that the velocity of any object at any time t is given as: ... At At t = 0 sec, the magnitude of velocity is 2m/s and is moving in the forward direction i.e.v (t) = -2.
Explanation:
In total, the length is measured from the tip of the bow in a linear fashion to the stern of the formation of delight including any back-deck extensions. The measurement involves bow sprits; rudders; detachable engines and engine sections; handles; and various fittings and connections.
Importance in calculating a boat's length:
it affects the transportation costs (the longer the length, the higher the cost).
The pontoon's length counts as you find out how much rope you need to wrestle.
The cost of vessel settlement on marinas depends in part on the pontoon length. As more area is consumed by a more drawn pontoon, the docking charges are higher.
Transportation guidelines will probably not allow pontoons past a specific length on specific occasions of the day.
Answer:
A. speed = 7.14 Km/s
B. distance = 1820.7 Km
Explanation:
Given that: a = 14.0 m/
, t = 8.50 minutes.
But,
t = 8.50 = 8.50 x 60
= 510 seconds
A. By applying the first equation of motion, the speed of the shuttle at the end of 8.50 minutes can be determined by;
v = u + at
where: v is the final velocity, u is the initial velocity, a is the acceleration and t is the time.
u = 0
So that,
v = 14 x 510
= 7140 m/s
The speed of the shuttle at the end of 8.50 minute is 7.14 Km/s.
B. the distance traveled can be determined by applying second equation of motion.
s = ut + 
a
where: s is the distance, u is the initial velocity, a is the acceleration and t is the time.
u = 0
s = a
= x 14 x 
= 7 x 260100
= 1820700 m
The distance that the shuttle has traveled during the given time is 1820.7 Km.
You asked a question. I'm about to answer it.
Sadly, I can almost guarantee that you won't understand the solution.
This realization grieves me, but there is little I can do to change it.
My explanation will be the best of which I'm capable.
Here are the Physics facts I'll use in the solution:
-- "Apparent magnitude" means how bright the star appears to us.
-- "Absolute magnitude" means the how bright the star WOULD appear
if it were located 32.6 light years from us (10 parsecs).
-- A change of 5 magnitudes means a 100 times change in brightness,
so each magnitude means brightness is multiplied or divided by ⁵√100 .
That's about 2.512... .
-- Increasing magnitude means dimmer.
Decreasing magnitude means brighter.
+5 is 10 magnitudes dimmer than -5 .
-- Apparent brightness is inversely proportional to the square
of the distance from the source (just like gravity, sound, and
the force between charges).
That's all the Physics. The rest of the solution is just arithmetic.
____________________________________________________
-- The star in the question would appear M(-5) at a distance of
32.6 light years.
-- It actually appears as a M(+5). That's 10 magnitudes dimmer than M(-5),
because of being farther away than 32.6 light years.
-- 10 magnitudes dimmer is ( ⁵√100)⁻¹⁰ = (100)^(-2) .
-- But brightness varies as the inverse square of distance,
so that exponent is (negative double) the ratio of the distances,
and the actual distance to the star is
(32.6) · (100)^(1) light years
= (32.6) · (100) light years
= approx. 3,260 light years . (roughly 1,000 parsecs)
I'll have to confess that I haven't done one of these calculations
in over 50 years, and I'm not really that confident in my result.
If somebody's health or safety depended on it, or the success of
a space mission, then I'd be strongly recommending that you get
a second opinion.
But, quite frankly, I do feel that mine is worth the 5 points.
