1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
motikmotik
3 years ago
5

Tribal Law Enforcement provides a broad range of public safety and has authority anywhere in the United States?

Law
1 answer:
White raven [17]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

true

Explanation:

it is product that use to sell to other country

You might be interested in
What are all the steps for making a smooth stop?
navik [9.2K]

Answer: Slowly press the breaks.

4 0
3 years ago
Which of these people should use the "married filing jointly" tax filing status? A. Mr. And Mrs. Jaden, who want to file their i
devlian [24]
A “mr and mrs.Jaden” indicates that they are married.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following cases established testimony by expert witness?
Ksivusya [100]

Answer:

Explanation:

Judge is the gatekeeper

The judge is to decide whether the expert is qualified to deliver reliable testimony and whether the expert's report is sufficiently reliable to be helpful to the Trier of Fact.

Rule 702 Testimony by Experts

1) the testimony is based upon sufficient facts or data

2) the testimony is the product of reliable principles and methods.

The Supreme Court identified four tests that can be used by the gatekeeper-judge to determine whether to admit the expert testimony. It is typically understood that it is not necessary for the expert testimony to pass all four tests.

1) Tested - Whether the theory or technique used by the expert can be, and has been, tested

2) Peer Review - Whether the theory or technique has been subjected to peer review and publication

3) Error Rate - The known or potential rate of error of the method used is known or predictable

4) General Acceptance - The degree of the method's or conclusion's acceptance within the relevant scientific community

Review of five court cases

1) Frye v. United States - 1923 - established the "general acceptance" principle

2) Federal Rules of Evidence - Rule 702 - 1975 - established the rule for "scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge" expert witness testimony

3) Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals - 1993 - established the four-part Daubert test for evaluating expert testimony

4) GE v. Joiner - 1997 - confirmed the trial judge's gatekeeper role

5) Kumho Tire v. Carmichael - 1999 - expanded the Daubert tests to apply to all disciplines

United States v. 14.38 Acres of Land

A good example of the application of the Daubert Test.

This is a rare case where the appellate court overruled the trial judge's gatekeeper role.

Gatekeeper is not intended to serve as a replacement for the adversary system: Vigorous cross-examination, presentation of contrary evidence, and careful instruction on the burden of proof are the traditional and appropriate means of attacking shaky but admissible evidence.

Rule 1 - Scope and Purpose

To secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding. In other words, the purpose is to make the process more efficient.

The report must contain:

(i) a complete statement of all opinions the witness will express and the basis and reasons for them;

(ii) the data or other information considered by the witness in forming them;

(iii) any exhibits that will be used to summarize or support them;

(iv) the witness's qualifications, including a list of all publications authored in the previous 10 years;

(v) a list of all other cases in which, during the previous 4 years, the witness testified as an expert at trial or by deposition; and

(vi) a statement of the compensation to be paid for the study and testimony in the case.

That written report must contain, at a minimum, six items:

1) All opinions the witness will express and their foundation and reasoning;

2) Data and information considered by the witness;

3) Any exhibits that will be used while giving the testimony in court;

4) Witness qualifications, including all publications authored in the previous 10 years;

5) List of all other cases in the last four years where testimony was given as an expert at trial or deposition;

6) Description of the compensation for the study and testimony.

An appraisal report may need to be quite detailed. This may be at odds with the request of retaining counsel, who may want a less detailed report.

Report should include any exhibits which the witness anticipates using as "demonstrative evidence" during testimony.

report should include a statement of publications and testimony for the prescribed periods.

Some items of interest in this Rule are:

1 - If an objection is raised by one of the attorneys, the deponent will still be required to provide an answer, but that answer will be subject to approval by the court after hearing the objection.

2 - The deponent may refuse to answer a question only when it is necessary to preserve a privilege, enforce a limitation directly by the court, or present a motion under Rule 30(d)(4).

3 - The maximum time limit for a deposition is one day of seven hours.

4 - The deponent has the right to review and correct the transcript. He or she will have 30 days after receiving the transcript to review and submit corrections. However, this right must be affirmed and requested during the deposition. It is recommended that the appraiser expert always request this right to review and correct, as it will provide the appraiser with a copy of the transcript of the "oral report" for his or her workfile.

Rule 33 - Interrogatories to Parties

The time limit to respond is 30 days from the date of service of the interrogatories.

6 0
3 years ago
which criteria must a law meet in order to pass the government’s strict scrutiny test to reasonably discriminate? select all tha
KatRina [158]

The criteria that law must meet in order to pass the government’s strict scrutiny test to reasonably discriminate includes"

  • It must further a compelling government interest
  • It must use the least restrictive means to achieve its purpose.

<h3>What is a strict scrutiny test?</h3>

In law, a strict scrutiny refers to the highest standard of review which a court will use to evaluate the constitutionality of governmental discrimination. In order for a law to pass strict scrutiny, the legislature must have passed the law to further a "compelling governmental interest" and must have narrowly tailored the law to achieve that interest.

This standard is the highest and most of the stringent standard of judicial review and is part of the levels of judicial scrutiny that courts use to determine whether a constitutional right or principle should give way to the government's interest against observance of the principle. However, the lesser standards are rational basis review and exacting or intermediate scrutiny and these standards are applied to statutes and government action at all levels of government within the United States.

Read more about strict scrutiny

brainly.com/question/14671704

#SPJ1

7 0
1 year ago
Will give brainliest 3
AysviL [449]

Answer:

ok?

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Criminologists Richard Hawkins and Geoffrey Alpert Observe that the work of correctional officers is characterized by both
    7·1 answer
  • When the Chicago Police Department raised the minimum age for an applicant from 21 to 25, they did so because _____.
    10·2 answers
  • In a typical ________ procedure, parties select a disinterested and informed party or parties to serve as a referee to determine
    6·2 answers
  • How as technology help the press​
    8·2 answers
  • Define the term demand ​
    9·2 answers
  • How many seats are on the Supreme Court?
    5·2 answers
  • 13. About how many teen drivers were killed in motor vehicle crahes in the
    12·1 answer
  • you are researching the effect of air pollution on human health.you find information from the following sources.which of these w
    11·1 answer
  • What is the final step for a bill to become a law? A. Being approved by a congressional committe B. Be
    15·2 answers
  • Do u like jazz i do what abt u
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!