Answer:
The statement "The magnetic field of a magnet comes out of the north pole and goes into the south pole" is imprecise
Explanation:
This is because the zero divergence equation (∇ · B = 0 ) is valid for any magnetic field, even if it is time dependent rather than static. Physically, it means that there are no magnetic charges otherwise we would have ∇ · B ∝ ρmag instead of ∇ · B = 0. Consequently, the magnetic field lines never begin or end anywhere in space; instead they form closed loops or run from infinity to infinity.
Answer: B. development of female sex
Development of female sex characteristic is not associated with the amount of cortisol in the body.
Explanation:
Cortisol is a steroid hormone secreted by the adrenal gland. It facilitates stress response, regulates blood sugar level and helps fight infections. High cortisol level leads to Cushing syndrome and low cortisol level leads to Addison disease.
Obesity is a symptom of Cushing syndrome while weight loss is a symptom of Addison disease. Thus levels of cortisol can affect body weight as well. When in a stressful situation, our body pumps excess cortisol.
Cortisol level in our body is generally high in the mornings and low in the midnight.
Answer:
1.92 kg of nitrogen.
Explanation:
The following data were obtained from the question:
Heat absorbed (Q) = 384000 J
Note: Heat of vaporisation (ΔHv) of nitrogen = 5600 J/mol
Next, we shall determine the number of mole of nitrogen that absorbed 384000 J.
This is illustrated below:
Q = mol·ΔHv
384000 = mole of N2 x 5600
Divide both side by 5600
Mole of N2 = 384000/5600
Mole of N2 = 68.57 moles
Next, we shall convert 68.57 moles of nitrogen, N2 to grams.
This can be obtained as follow:
Molar mass of N2 = 2 x 14 = 28 g/mol.
Mole of N2 = 68.57 moles.
Mass of N2 =..?
Mole = mass /molar mass
68.57 = mass of N2 /28
Cross multiply
Mass of N2 = 68.57 x 28
Mass of N2 = 1919.96 g
Finally, we shall convert 1919.96 g to kilograms.
This can be achieved as shown below:
1000g = 1 kg
Therefore,
1919.96 g = 1919.96/1000 = 1.92 kg.
Therefore, 1.92 kg of nitrogen were burned off.
After one meter, 3.4% of the light is gone ... either soaked up in the fiber
material or escaped from it. So only (100 - 3.4) = 96.6% of the light
remains, to go on to the next meter.
After the second meter, 96.6% of what entered it emerges from it, and
that's 96.6% of 96.6% of the original signal that entered the beginning
of the fiber.
==> After 2 meters, the intensity has dwindled to (0.966)² of its original level.
It's that exponent of ' 2 ' that corresponds to the number of meters that the light
has traveled through.
==> After 'x' meters of fiber, the remaininglight intensity is (0.966) ^x-power
of its original value.
If you shine 1,500 lumens into the front of the fiber, then after 'x' meters of
cable, you'll have
<em>(1,500) · (0.966)^x</em>
lumens of light remaining.
=========================================
The genius engineers in the fiber design industry would not handle it this way.
When they look up the 'attenuation' of the cable in the fiber manufacturer's
catalog, it would say "15dB per 100 meters".
What does that mean ? Break it down: 15dB in 100 meters is <u>0.15dB per meter</u>.
Now, watch this:
Up at the top, the problem told us that the loss in 1 meter is 3.4% . We applied
super high mathematics to that and calculated that 96.6% remains, or 0.966.
Look at this ==> 10 log(0.966) = <em><u>-0.15</u> </em> <== loss per meter, in dB .
Armed with this information, the engineer ... calculating the loss in 'x' meters of
fiber cable, doesn't have to mess with raising numbers to powers. All he has to
do is say ...
-- 0.15 dB loss per meter
-- 'x' meters of cable
-- 0.15x dB of loss.
If 'x' happens to be, say, 72 meters, then the loss is (72) (0.15) = 10.8 dB .
and 10 ^ (-10.8/10) = 10 ^ -1.08 = 0.083 = <em>8.3%</em> <== <u>That's</u> how much light
he'll have left after 72 meters, and all he had to do was a simple multiplication.
Sorry. Didn't mean to ramble on. But I do stuff like this every day.
