1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
RUDIKE [14]
3 years ago
11

Part C Let’s start the analysis by looking at your “extreme usage” cases. Compare the two cases in detail—low usage period versu

s high usage period. Discuss differences between the two as well as any surprises. Things you should cover in your discussion: How much difference was there in average power usage (avg. kW) between the low-usage and high-usage time periods? What might have been running during the low-usage period that used energy? Identify likely “stealth” energy users that you could not turn off during the low-usage period. What do you suppose contributed most to the usage during the high-usage period?
Physics
1 answer:
Serga [27]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Day 7 DataUsage notes (since last reading)day & datetimekWh readingkWh usedhours elapsedavg. kW usedb.Usage Extremes: Data CollectionFor this experiment, you’ll measure electrical usage during a time period when you expect to havevery light electrical usage (for instance, while you’re asleep at night or during the day when no oneis at home). Likewise you’ll measure electrical usage during a time period when you expect to have heavier than average electrical usage. This time period might be in the evening, when lights and other appliances are on. Both of these time periods should be at least 4 hours long, to increase the accuracy of your results. Record your results in the tables below for each situation. For each time period, you’ll need to takean initial and a final reading.Type your response here:Low Usage - Initial Readingday & datetimekWh readingLow Usage - Final ReadingEnergy Usage Notesday & datetimekWh readingkWh usedhours elapsedavg. kW usedHigh Usage - Initial Readingday & datetimekWh reading4

You might be interested in
A particle of charge 2.0 x 10^-8C experiences an upward force of magnitude 4.0 x10^-6 when it is placed in a particular point in
koban [17]

Answer:

a) The electric field at that point is 2.0\times 10^{2} newtons per coulomb.

b) The electric force is 2.0\times 10^{-6} newtons.

Explanation:

a) Let suppose that electric field is uniform, then the following electric field can be applied:

E = \frac{F_{e}}{q} (1)

Where:

E - Electric field, measured in newtons per coulomb.

F_{e} - Electric force, measured in newtons.

q - Electric charge, measured in coulombs.

If we know that F_{e} = 4.0\times 10^{-6}\,N and q = 2.0\times 10^{-8}\,C, then the electric field at that point is:

E = \frac{4.0\times 10^{-6}\,N}{2.0\times 10^{-8}\,C}

E = 2.0\times 10^{2}\,\frac{N}{C}

The electric field at that point is 2.0\times 10^{2} newtons per coulomb.

b) If we know that E = 2.0\times 10^{2}\,\frac{N}{C} and q = 1.0\times 10^{-8}\,C, then the electric force is:

F_{e} = E\cdot q

F_{e} = \left(2.0\times 10^{2}\,\frac{N}{C} \right)\cdot (1.0\times 10^{-8}\,C)

F_{e} = 2.0\times 10^{-6}\,N

The electric force is 2.0\times 10^{-6} newtons.

7 0
3 years ago
Oxygen has an atomic number of 8. What can you conclude from this fact?
Alja [10]

Answer:

The answer to your question is below

Explanation:

If Oxygen has an atomic number of 8, we can conclude that:

- If neutral, it has 8 protons and 8 electrons

- It has 8 neutrons and its atomic mass is 16 (A = 8 + 8)

- It must be located in the group VI A

- Its valence number must be 6

- Its Oxidation number is -2

7 0
3 years ago
A cutting tool several forces acting on it. One force is F=-axy^2 j , a force in the negative y-direction whose magnitude depend
liq [111]
The force on the tool is entirely in the negative-y direction.
So no work is done during any moves in the x-direction.

The work will be completely defined by

                     (Force) x (distance in the y-direction),

and it won't matter what route the tool follows to get anywhere. 
Only the initial and final y-coordinates matter.

We know that    F = - 2.85 y².  (I have no idea what that ' j ' is doing there.)
Remember that 'F' is pointing down.

From  y=0  to  y=2.40  is a distance of  2.40  upward.

Sadly, since the force is not linear over the distance, I don't think
we can use the usual formula for  Work = (force) x (distance).
I think instead we'll need to integrate the force over the distance,
and I can't wait to see whether I still know how to do that.

        Work  =  integral of (F·dy) evaluated from  0  to  2.40

                  =  integral of (-2.85 y² dy) evaluated from  0  to  2.40

                 =  (-2.85) · integral of  (y² dy)  evaluated from  0  to  2.40 .


Now, integral of (y² dy)  =  1/3  y³ .

Evaluated from  0  to  2.40 , it's  (1/3 · 2.40³) - (1/3 · 0³)

                                            =  1/3 · 13.824  =  4.608 .

And the work  =  (-2.85) · the integral

                     =  (-2.85) · (4.608)

                     =      - 13.133  .

-- There are no units in the question (except for that mysterious ' j ' after the 'F',
which totally doesn't make any sense at all).
If the ' F ' is newtons and the 2.40 is meters, then the  -13.133 is joules.

-- The work done by the force is negative, because the force points
DOWN but we lifted the tool UP to 2.40.  Somebody had to provide
13.133 of positive work to lift the tool up against the force, and the force
itself did 13.133 of negative work to 'allow' the tool to move up. 

-- It doesn't matter whether the tool goes there along the line  x=y , or
by some other route.  WHATEVER the route is, the work done by ' F ' 
is going to total up to be  -13.133 joules at the end of the day.

As I hinted earlier, the last time I actually studied integration was in 1972,
and I haven't really used it too much since then.  But that's my answer
and I'm stickin to it.  If I'm wrong, then I'm wrong, and I hope somebody
will show me where I'm wrong.
3 0
3 years ago
Global climate change has caused ocean temperatures to increase. Which evidence supports this claim?
Anuta_ua [19.1K]
D. Sea level has risen more than 300 centimeters. This is true because as the earth gets warmer, ice will melt and turn into water which goes into the ocean making it rise.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Please help with this, thank you!
larisa86 [58]

The positive charge is strongest in the middle, because that is were the charges are going off from.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Tarzan swings back and forth on a long vine with a period of 7.27 s. how long is the vine?(unit=m)
    9·1 answer
  • 5. The group number of the carbon family is:<br> a. 1<br> b. 2<br> C. 3<br> d. 4
    12·1 answer
  • Which statement correctly defines power?
    13·1 answer
  • How is energy transferred through a generator that produces electric current? A.from armature to commutator to brushes to turbin
    13·2 answers
  • Kiko writes a roport to compare and contrast the code of plants and animals. Which of the following statements is accurato arvd
    7·1 answer
  • A gymnast dismounts the uneven parallel bars with some angular momentum about her transverse axis. Just after release, she is in
    14·1 answer
  • Which of these is a TRUE statement? A) Sound travels through gases easier than liquids. B) Sound travels through solids easier t
    14·2 answers
  • Which wavelength would scientists use to measure the molecular structure of H2O?
    15·1 answer
  • Please help! The image produced by a concave mirror is ? .
    6·2 answers
  • A car moving at a speed of 10 m/s enters a Q. highway and accelerates at 4 m/s2. How fast will the car be moving after it accele
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!