Answer:
There was an improvement in accuracy. There was no change in precision.
Explanation:
<em>The average mass after recalibration is closer to the mass of the standard, </em>so the recalibration improved the accuracy<em> </em>(the measurement is closer to an accepted 'true' value).
The standard deviation did not change, so the precision (or how disperse the measurements are) was not affected.
Answer:
The molar mass of carbon
Explanation:
Before the mass (in grams) of two moles of carbon can be determined, <u>the molar mass of the element would be needed.</u>
<em>This is because the number of mole of an element is the ratio of its mass and the molar mass</em>. That is,
number of mole = mass/molar mass
Hence, the mass of elements can be obtained by making it the subject of the formular;
mass = number of mole x molar mass
<em>Therefore, the molar mass of carbon would be needed before the mass of 2 moles of the element can be determined.</em>
Large intestines hgtgfjcob turn o bff 15th t ? vc
