All categories

3 years ago

Fill in the blank

Mathematics

1 answer:

DanielleElmas [232]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

If the decimal place has moved to the left then multiply by a positive power of 10; to the right will result in a negative power of 10. Example: To write 3040 in scientific notation we must move the decimal point 3 places to the left, so it becomes 3.04 x 103.

Step-by-step explanation:

You might be interested in

Tan 9x - tan 5x/ 1+ tan 9x tan 5x

NeTakaya

Answer:

tan 4x

Step-by-step explanation:

Note the difference identity for tangent ratio is

tan(x - y) = $\frac{tanx-tany}{1+tanxtany}$

Given

$\frac{tan9x-tan5x}{1+tan9xtan5x}$ ← in the form of the right side of the expansion, thus

= tan(9x - 5x)

= tan 4x

8 0

3 years ago

Following are the published weights (in pounds) of all of the team members of Football Team A from a previous year.178; 203; 212

mylen [45]

Answer:

a. 241; b. 206.0; c. 272.0; d. 174 to 232; other answers (see below).

Step-by-step explanation:

First, at all, we need to organize the data from the smallest to the largest value:

174 178 178 184 185 185 185 185 188 190 200 203 205 206 210 212 212 212 212 215 215 220 223 228 230 232 241 241 242 245 247 250 250 259 260 260 265 265 270 272 273 275 276 278 280 280 285 285 286 290 290 295 302

This step is important to find the median, the first quartile, and the third quartile. There are numerous methods to find the median and the other quartiles, but in this case, we are going to use a method described by Tukey, and it does not need calculators or software to estimate it.

<h3>Part a: Median</h3>

In this case, we have 53 values (an odd number of values), the median is the value that has the same number of values below and above it, so what is the value that has 26 values below and above it? Well, in the organized data above this value is the 27th value, because it has 26 values above and below it:

174 178 178 184 185 185 185 185 188 190 200 203 205 206 210 212 212 212 212 215 215 220 223 228 230 232 241 241 242 245 247 250 250 259 260 260 265 265 270 272 273 275 276 278 280 280 285 285 286 290 290 295 302

The median is 241.

<h3>Part b: First Quartile</h3>

For the first quartile, we need to calculate the median for the lower half of the values from the median previously obtained. Since we have an odd number of values (53), we have to include the median in this calculation. We have 27 values (including the median), so the "median" for these values is the value with 13 values below and above it.

174 178 178 184 185 185 185 185 188 190 200 203 205 206 210 212 212 212 212 215 215 220 223 228 230 232 <em>241</em>

Since we are asking to round the answer to one decimal place, the first quartile is 206.0

<h3>Part c: Third Quartile</h3>

We use the same procedure used to find the first quartile, but in this case, using the upper half of the values.

<em>241</em> 241 242 245 247 250 250 259 260 260 265 265 270 272 273 275 276 278 280 280 285 285 286 290 290 295 302

So, the third quartile is 272.0

<h3>Part d: The middle 50% </h3>

The second quartile is the median and "50% of the data lies below this point" (Quartile (2020), in Wikipedia). Having this information into account, 50% of the weights lies below the median 241.

Thus, the middle 50% of the weights are from 174 to 232.

174 178 178 184 185 185 185 185 188 190 200 203 205 206 210 212 212 212 212 215 215 220 223 228 230 232 <em>241</em>

<h3>Part e: Sample or Population 1</h3>

If the population were all professional football players, the right option is:

<em>The above data would be a sample of weights because they represent a subset of the population of all football players. </em>

It represents a sample. Supposing Football Team A are all professional, they can be considered a sample from all professional football players.

<h3>Part f: Sample or Population 2</h3>

If the population were Football Team A, the right option is:

<em>The data would be a population of weights because they represent all of the players on Football Team A. </em>

<h3>Part g: population mean and more</h3><h3>Part i</h3>

The mean for the population of weights of Football Team A is the sum of all weights (12529 pounds) divided by the number of cases (53).

$\\ \mu = \frac{12529}{53} = 236.39622641509433$

$\\ \mu = \frac{12529}{53} = 236.40$

The standard deviation for the population is:

$\\ \sigma = \sqrt(\frac{(x_{1}-\mu)^2 + (x_{2}-\mu)^2 + ... + (x_{n}-\mu)^2}{n})$

In words, we need to take either value, subtract it from the population mean, square the resulting value, sum all the values for the 53 cases (in this case, the value is 74332.67924), divide the value by 53 (1402.50338) and take the square root of it (37.45001).

Then, the population standard deviation is 37.45.

The weight that is 3 standard deviations below the mean can be obtained using the following formula:

$\\ z = \frac{x - \mu}{\sigma}$

$\\ \mu= 236.40\;and\;\sigma=37.45$

Then, in the case of three standard deviations below the mean, z = -3.

$\\ -3 = \frac{x - 236.40}{37.45}$

$\\ x = -3*37.45 + 236.40$

$\\ x = 124.05$

For the player that weights 209 pounds:

$\\ z = \frac{x - \mu}{\sigma}$

$\\ z = \frac{229 - 236.40}{37.45}$

$\\ z = -0.19$

<h3>Part h: Comparing Weights of Team A and Team B</h3>

For Team B, we have a <em>mean</em> and a <em>standard deviation</em> of:

$\\ \mu=240.08\;and\;\sigma=44.38$

And Player B weighed 229 pounds.

$\\ z = \frac{x - \mu}{\sigma}$

$\\ z = \frac{229 - 240.08}{44.38}$

$\\ z = -0.70$

This value says that Player B is lighter with respect to his team than Player A, because his weight is 0.70 below the mean of Football Team B, whereas Player A has a weight that is closer to the mean of his team. So, the answer is:

<em>Player B, because he is more standard deviations away from his team's mean weight.</em>

<h3 />

4 0

3 years ago

In a sample of 1200 U.S.â€‹ adults, 191 dine out at a resaurant more than once per week. Two U.S. adults are selected at random

allochka39001 [22]

Answer:

a) The probability that both adults dine out more than once per week = 0.0253

b) The probability that neither adult dines out more than once per week = 0.7069

c) The probability that at least one of the two adults dines out more than once per week = 0.2931

d) Of the three events described, the event that can be considered unusual because of its low probability of occurring, 0.0253 (2.53%), is the event that the two randomly selected adults both dine out more than once per week.

Step-by-step explanation:

In a sample of 1200 U.S. adults, 191 dine out at a restaurant more than once per week.

Assuming this sample.is a random sample and is representative of the proportion of all U.S. adults, the probability of a randomly picked U.S. adult dining out at a restaurant more than once per week = (191/1200) = 0.1591666667 = 0.1592

Now, assuming this probability per person is independent of each other.

Two adults are picked at random from the entire population of U.S. adults, with no replacement, thereby making sure these two are picked at absolute random.

a) The probability that both adults dine out more than once per week.

Probability that adult A dines out more than once per week = P(A) = 0.1592

Probability that adult B dines out more than once per week = P(B) = 0.1592

Probability that adult A and adult B dine out more than once per week = P(A n B)

= P(A) × P(B) (since the probability for each person is independent of the other person)

= 0.1592 × 0.1592

= 0.02534464 = 0.0253 to 4 d.p.

b) The probability that neither adult dines out more than once per week.

Probability that adult A dines out more than once per week = P(A) = 0.1592

Probability that adult A does NOT dine out more than once per week = P(A') = 1 - P(A) = 1 - 0.1592 = 0.8408

Probability that adult B dines out more than once per week = P(B) = 0.1592

Probability that adult B does NOT dine out more than once per week = P(B') = 1 - P(B) = 1 - 0.1592 = 0.8408

Probability that neither adult dines out more than once per week = P(A' n B')

= P(A') × P(B')

= 0.8408 × 0.8408

= 0.70694464 = 0.7069 to 4 d.p.

c) The probability that at least one of the two adults dines out more than once per week.

Probability that adult A dines out more than once per week = P(A) = 0.1592

Probability that adult A does NOT dine out more than once per week = P(A') = 1 - P(A) = 1 - 0.1592 = 0.8408

Probability that adult B dines out more than once per week = P(B) = 0.1592

Probability that adult B does NOT dine out more than once per week = P(B') = 1 - P(B) = 1 - 0.1592 = 0.8408

The probability that at least one of the two adults dines out more than once per week

= P(A n B') + P(A' n B) + P(A n B)

= [P(A) × P(B')] + [P(A') × P(B)] + [P(A) × P(B)]

= (0.1592 × 0.8408) + (0.8408 × 0.1592) + (0.1592 × 0.1592)

= 0.13385536 + 0.13385536 + 0.02534464

= 0.29305536 = 0.2931 to 4 d.p.

d) Which of the events can be considered unusual? Explain.

The event that can be considered as unusual is the event that has very low probabilities of occurring, probabilities of values less than 5% (0.05).

And of the three events described, the event that can be considered unusual because of its low probability of occurring, 0.0253 (2.53%), is the event that the two randomly selected adults both dine out more than once per week.

Hope this Helps!!!

6 0

3 years ago

SOS <br> EASY MATH PLZ SOS

KiRa [710]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanations:

120 + 75.50 + 50.16 + 39.33=284.99

284.99*5=1424.95

then you round which would equal

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Answer ASAP

Otrada [13]

Answer:

A - it is $78.5

B-$98

C- 2.95- 4.00 =

-1.05

PLZ MARK AS BRAINLY AND LIKE

4 0

3 years ago