No, you can't aim where you see the fish, because refraction will change the position of the fish and make it appear in a different position from where it actually is.
Hope this helps!
Atmosphere
Atmospheric gas from prehistoric eras is found trapped in glaciers in the form of bubbles. These gas bubbles are the basis of studying ice cores as they provide us with accurate estimates of the conditions of past climates. The bubbles allow us to determine the composition of atmospheric air, such as the carbon dioxide and methane concentrations, as well as allow us to determine air temperatures in the past.
To solve this problem, let us recall that the formula for
gases assuming ideal behaviour is given as:
rms = sqrt (3 R T / M)
where
R = gas constant = 8.314 Pa m^3 / mol K
T = temperature
M = molar mass
Now we get the ratios of rms of Argon (1) to hydrogen (2):
rms1 / rms2 = sqrt (3 R T1 / M1) / sqrt (3 R T2 / M2)
or
rms1 / rms2 = sqrt ((T1 / M1) / (T2 / M2))
rms1 / rms2 = sqrt (T1 M2 / T2 M1)
Since T1 = 4 T2
rms1 / rms2 = sqrt (4 T2 M2 / T2 M1)
rms1 / rms2 = sqrt (4 M2 / M1)
and M2 = 2 while M1 = 40
rms1 / rms2 = sqrt (4 * 2 / 40)
rms1 / rms2 = 0.447
Therefore the ratio of rms is:
<span>rms_Argon / rms_Hydrogen = 0.45</span>
Answer:
The statement is incorrect because, a force acting on an object does not necessarily have to produce motion.
People have the misconception that when a force acts on an object it always produces motion
Explanation:
The statement is incorrect because, a force acting on an object does not necessarily have to produce motion. It could be in static equilibrium where the net force is zero and produces not motion. The body could also be in dynamic equilibrium when no net force acts on it moving at a constant velocity. But here we are concerned with static equilibrium since the body does not move at all.
People have the misconception that when a force acts on an object it always produces motion and, we have seen from the above tat its not always true.
