Answer: Laplace equation provides a linear solution and helps in obtaining other solutions by being added to various solution of a particular equation as well.
Inviscid , incompressible and irrotational field have and basic solution ans so they can be governed by the Laplace equation to obtain a interesting and non-common solution .The analysis of such solution in a flow of Laplace equation is termed as potential flow.
Answer:
It would take approximately 305 s to go to 99% completion
Explanation:
Given that:
y = 50% = 0.5
n = 1.7
t = 100 s
We need to first find the parameter k from the equation below.

taking the natural logarithm of both sides:

Substituting values:

Also
![t^n=-\frac{ln(1-y)}{k}\\t=\sqrt[n]{-\frac{ln(1-y)}{k}}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=t%5En%3D-%5Cfrac%7Bln%281-y%29%7D%7Bk%7D%5C%5Ct%3D%5Csqrt%5Bn%5D%7B-%5Cfrac%7Bln%281-y%29%7D%7Bk%7D%7D)
Substituting values and y = 99% = 0.99
![t=\sqrt[n]{-\frac{ln(1-y)}{k}}=\sqrt[1.7]{-\frac{ln(1-0.99)}{2.76*10^{-4}}}=304.6s](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=t%3D%5Csqrt%5Bn%5D%7B-%5Cfrac%7Bln%281-y%29%7D%7Bk%7D%7D%3D%5Csqrt%5B1.7%5D%7B-%5Cfrac%7Bln%281-0.99%29%7D%7B2.76%2A10%5E%7B-4%7D%7D%7D%3D304.6s)
∴ t ≅ 305 s
It would take approximately 305 s to go to 99% completion
Answer:
Both of them are wrong
Explanation:
The two technicians have given the wrong information about the wires.
This is because firstly, a higher rating of AWG means it is smaller in diameter. Thus, the diameter of a 18 AWG wire is smaller than that of a 12 AWG wire and that makes the assertion of the technician wrong.
Also, the higher the resistance, the smaller the cross sectional area meaning the smaller the diameter. A wire with bigger cross sectional area will have a smaller resistance
So this practically makes the second technician wrong too
Answer:




Explanation:
From the question we are told that:
Zener diode Voltage 
Zener diode Current 
Note

Supply Voltage 
Reduction Percentage 
Generally the equation for Kirchhoff's Voltage Law is mathematically given by



Therefore




Generally the equation for Kirchhoff's Current Law is mathematically given by




Therefore


