Answer:
1.28 mol Cu(OH)₂
General Formulas and Concepts:
<u>Chemistry - Atomic Structure</u>
- Reading a Periodic Table
- Using Dimensional Analysis
Explanation:
<u>Step 1: Define</u>
125 g Cu(OH)₂
<u>Step 2: Identify Conversions</u>
Molar Mass of Cu - 63.55 g/mol
Molar Mass of O - 16.00 g/mol
Molar Mass of H - 1.01 g/mol
Molar Mass of Cu(OH)₂ - 63.55 + 2(16.00) + 2(1.01) = 97.57 g/mol
<u>Step 3: Convert</u>
= 1.28113 mol Cu(OH)₂
<u>Step 4: Check</u>
<em>We are given 3 sig figs. Follow sig fig rules and round.</em>
1.28113 mol Cu(OH)₂ ≈ 1.28 mol Cu(OH)₂
Energy is distributed not just in translational KE, but also in rotation, vibration and also distributed in electronic energy levels (if input great enough, bond breaks).
All four forms of energy are quantised and the quanta ‘gap’ differences increases from trans. KE ==> electronic.
Entropy (S) and energy distribution: The energy is distributed amongst the energy levels in the particles to maximise their entropy.
Entropy is a measure of both the way the particles are arranged AND the ways the quanta of energy can be arranged.
We can apply ΔSθsys/surr/tot ideas to chemical changes to test feasibility of a reaction:
ΔSθtot = ΔSθsys + ΔSθsurr
ΔSθtot must be >=0 for a chemical change to be feasible.
For example: CaCO3(s) ==> CaO(s) + CO2(g)
ΔSθsys = ΣSθproducts – ΣSθreactants
ΔSθsys = SθCaO(s) + SθCO2(g) – SθCaCO3(s)
ΔSθsurr is –ΔHθ/T(K) and ΔH is very endothermic (very +ve),
Now ΔSθsys is approximately constant with temperature and at room temperature the ΔSθsurr term is too negative for ΔSθtot to be plus overall.
But, as the temperature is raised, the ΔSθsurr term becomes less negative and eventually at about 800oCΔSθtot becomes plus overall (and ΔGθ becomes negative), so the decomposition is now chemically, and 'commercially' feasible in a lime kiln.
CaCO3(s) ==> CaO(s) + CO2(g) ΔHθ = +179 kJ mol–1 (very endothermic)
This important industrial reaction for converting limestone (calcium carbonate) to lime (calcium oxide) has to be performed at high temperatures in a specially designed limekiln – which these days, basically consists of a huge rotating angled ceramic lined steel tube in which a mixture of limestone plus coal/coke/oil/gas? is fed in at one end and lime collected at the lower end. The mixture is ignited and excess air blasted through to burn the coal/coke and maintain a high operating temperature.
ΔSθsys = ΣSθproducts – ΣSθreactants
ΔSθsys = SθCaO(s) + SθCO2(g) – SθCaCO3(s) = (40.0) + (214.0) – (92.9) = +161.0 J mol–1 K–1
ΔSθsurr is –ΔHθ/T = –(179000/T)
ΔSθtot = ΔSθsys + ΔSθsurr
ΔSθtot = (+161) + (–179000/T) = 161 – 179000/T
If we then substitute various values of T (in Kelvin) you can calculate when the reaction becomes feasible.
For T = 298K (room temperature)
ΔSθtot = 161 – 179000/298 = –439.7 J mol–1 K–1, no good, negative entropy change
For T = 500K (fairly high temperature for an industrial process)
ΔSθtot = 161 – 179000/500 = –197.0, still no good
For T = 1200K (limekiln temperature)
ΔSθtot = 161 – 179000/1200 = +11.8 J mol–1 K–1, definitely feasible, overall positive entropy change
Now assuming ΔSθsys is approximately constant with temperature change and at room temperature the ΔSθsurr term is too negative for ΔSθtot to be plus overall. But, as the temperature is raised, the ΔSθsurr term becomes less negative and eventually at about 800–900oC ΔSθtot becomes plus overall, so the decomposition is now chemically, and 'commercially' feasible in a lime kiln.
You can approach the problem in another more efficient way by solving the total entropy expression for T at the point when the total entropy change is zero. At this point calcium carbonate, calcium oxide and carbon dioxide are at equilibrium.
ΔSθtot–equilib = 0 = 161 – 179000/T, 179000/T = 161, T = 179000/161 = 1112 K
This means that 1112 K is the minimum temperature to get an economic yield. Well at first sight anyway. In fact because the carbon dioxide is swept away in the flue gases so an equilibrium is never truly attained so limestone continues to decompose even at lower temperatures.
Answer:
get a little more than that is a great deal for the company and inventor of a company how can we get u a great job with their best friend in a few months but il will send you i will be the only person I know of fishes and the best I have to ask me to make it to my own home wifi and I am grade up to the same thing and the same way of the American people I have a lot to make a simple one person
a) m(H₂C₂O₄) = 15.5 g.
n(H₂C₂O₄) = m(H₂C₂O₄) ÷ M(H₂C₂O₄).
n(H₂C₂O₄) = 15.5 g ÷ 90 g/mol.
n(H₂C₂O₄) = 0.172 mol; amount of substance.
N(H₂C₂O₄) = n(H₂C₂O₄) · Na (Avogadro constant).
N(H₂C₂O₄) = 0.172 mol · 6.022·10²³ 1/mol.
N(H₂C₂O₄) = 1.037·10²³; number of molecules.
b) In one molecule of oxalic acid there are two atoms of carbon:
N(C) = 2 · N(H₂C₂O₄).
N(C) = 2 · 1.037·10²³.
N(C) = 2.074·10²³; number of carbon atoms.
Answer:
n = 9
Explanation:
Given parameters:
Molar mass of Na₂SO₄.nH₂O = 304.04gmol⁻¹
Solution
To find the hydration number n, we simply express atomic masses of the atoms in the compound as equal to the given molar mass.
Atomic mass of Na = 23g
S = 32g
O = 16g
H = 1g
Molar mass of the compound is evaluated as:
2(23) + 32 + 4(16) + n[2(1) + 16] = 304.04
46 + 32 + 64 + 18n = 304.04
142 + 18n = 304.04
18n = 304.04 - 142
18n = 162.04
n = 9