Melanie is using<u> "critical" </u>thinking.
Critical thinking is the capacity to think what to do or what to accept. It incorporates the capacity to take part in intelligent and independent reasoning.
Critical thinking doesn't involve accumulating data. A man with a good memory and who knows a great deal of realities isn't really great at basic reasoning. A basic mastermind can find outcomes from what he knows, and he knows how to make utilization of data to take care of issues, and to look for relevant sources of data to educate himself.
Answer:
The Court ruled in Schenck v. United States (1919) that speech creating a “clear and present danger” is not protected under the First Amendment. This decision shows how the Supreme Court's interpretation of the First Amendment sometimes sacrifices individual freedoms in order to preserve social order. In Schenck v.
Explanation:
Judge Jasper believes in the theory of jurisprudence called legal realism.
For better understanding, we have to explain what legal realism is all about:
- Legal realism is simply referred to as studying or looking into how courts decide/judge their cases, and not according to what the law or rules say and shows the judge's notion of what would be fair based upon the piece of evidence presented of the case.
- It simply covers the idea that the Judges hold the key in every cases presented in court as they are led by how the law is being interpreted and most times, we as humans are often influenced by factors such as feelings, moods, alliances etc.
- It is commonly known worldwide as a number or school of legal thought
From the above, we can say that the answer that Judge Jasper believes in the theory of jurisprudence called legal realism is true
Learn more about legal realism from:
brainly.com/question/14482497
Every society has its own economic system. The way it does business is the most affected.
Tradition or freedom can be considered as society's values, and it guides the type of economic system that society will have.