The is true because I said so
D. distance = 23 m, displacement = + 1 m
Explanation:
Let's remind the difference between distance and displacement:
- distance is a scalar, and is the total length covered by an object, counting all the movements in any direction
- displacement is a vector connecting the starting point and the final point of a motion, so its magnitude is given by the length of this vector, and its direction is given by the direction of this vector.
In this case, the distance covered by Karen is given by the sum of all its movements:

The displacement instead is given by the difference between the final point (1.0 m in front of the starting line) and the starting point (the starting line, 0 m):

Answer:
45.88297 m
Violet
Explanation:
x = Gap between holes = 5.9 mm
= Wavelength = 527 nm
D = Diameter of eye = 5 mm
L= Distance of observer from holes
From Rayleigh criteria we have the relation

A person could be 45.88297 m from the tile and still resolve the holes
Resolving them better means increasing the distance between the observer and the holes. It can be seen here that the distance is inversely proportional to the wavelength. Violet has a lower wavelength than red so, violet light would resolve the holes better.
Answer:
4 hoop, disk, sphere
Explanation:
Because
We are given data that
Hoop, disk, sphere have Same mass and radius
So let
And Initial angular velocity, = 0
The Force on each be F
And Time = t
Also let
Radius of each = r
So let's find the inertia shall we!!
I1 = m r² /2
= 0.5 mr² the his is for dis
I2 = m r² for hoop
And
Moment of inertia of sphere wiil be
I3 = (2/5) mr²
= 0.4 mr²
So
ωf = ωi + α t
= 0 + ( τ / I ) t
= ( F r / I ) t
So we can see that
ωf is inversely proportional to moment of inertia.
And so we take the
Order of I ( least to greatest ) :
I3 (sphere) , I1 (disk) , I2 (hoop) , ,
Order of ωf: ( least to greatest)
That of omega xf is the reverse of inertial so
hoop, disk, sphere
Option - 4