Answer:
1
Explanation: that is the ratio
Answer:
Explanation:
If friction is neglected, the wheel cannot roll and can only slide frictionlessly and will have the same velocity at the bottom of the ramp as if it had been in free fall as it has converted the same amount of potential energy.
mgh = ½mv²
v = √(2gh) = √(2(9.81)(2.00)) = 6.26418... = 6.26 m/s
However if we do not ignore all friction and the wheel rolls without slipping down the slope, the potential energy becomes linear and rotational kinetic energy
mgh = ½mv² + ½Iω²
mgh = ½mv² + ½(½mR²)(v/R)²
2gh = v² + ½v²
2gh = 3v²/2
v = √(4gh/3) =√(4(9.81)(2.00)/3) = 5.11468... = 5.11 m/s
Answer:
Proxima Centauri
Explanation:
U 2 can help me by marking as brainliest........
Answer:
There's one or two reasons, depending on what is meant by "wind-powered car".
The first reason is that it's impossible for any transfer of energy to be 100% efficient. There will always be frictional losses.
Secondly, if the company means that they want to attach a wind turbine to the car so that the car is powered by the same wind that it generates, that violates the conservation of energy.
Given:
P1 = 400 kPa
T1 = 110 K
T2 = 235K
Required:
P2
Solution:
Apply Gay-Lussac’s
law where P/T = constant
P1/T1 = P2/T2
P2 = T2P1/T1
P2 = (235K)(400kPa)
/ (110K)
P2 = 855 kPa
