I agree with Todd. One time when we went to the beach this happened and the waves brought back the ball so…
:) (can you mark me brainliest?)
Answer:
1) 
2) 
3) 

Explanation:
Given:
width of river, 
speed of stream with respect to the ground, 
speed of the swimmer with respect to water, 
<u>Now the resultant of the two velocities perpendicular to each other:</u>



<u>Now the angle of the resultant velocity form the vertical:</u>



- Now the distance swam by the swimmer in this direction be d.
so,



Now the distance swept downward:



2)
On swimming 37° upstream:
<u>The velocity component of stream cancelled by the swimmer:</u>



<u>Now the net effective speed of stream sweeping the swimmer:</u>



<u>The component of swimmer's velocity heading directly towards the opposite bank:</u>



<u>Now the angle of the resultant velocity of the swimmer from the normal to the stream</u>:



- Now let the distance swam in this direction be d'.



<u>Now the distance swept downstream:</u>



3)
Time taken in crossing the rive in case 1:



Time taken in crossing the rive in case 2:



You have to cross multiply. So set up the equation like 1.6/x = 1/65 then multiply x by 1 and 1.6 by 65. The answer is 104 km/h.
Answer:
<u>Distance</u><u> </u><u>between</u><u> </u><u>them</u><u> </u><u>is</u><u> </u><u>4</u><u>,</u><u>2</u><u>0</u><u>0</u><u> </u><u>meters</u><u>.</u>
Explanation:
Consinder car A:

substitute:

Consider car B:

since these cars move in opposite directions, distance between them is their summation:
