Answer:
Politics / Andrew Heywood … member plurality (SMP) system ('first past the post') 208 Electoralsystems: second ballot system 209 Electoral systems: alternative vote
Answer:
an equitable relationship.
Explanation:
The equity theory suggests that the distribution of the resources should be done fairly in both partners. The theory was first theorized by John Stacy Adams in the 1960s. The distribution of resources are calculated by comparing contribution and benefits. This theory helps to find a fair balance between all the employees by distributing resources as per their contribution.
In the given case, Aidan and Jacob are receiving their salary as per their contribution. Aidan, who is the CEO of the company contributes and gives input to the company of 10 hours whereas Jacob works for 5 hours.
So, they both are receiving their salary according to the equity theory and thus they share an equitable relationship.
Putting something in chronological order means to arrange events in their order of occurrence in time. So...
An essay explaining the development of technology to the present day would be written in chronological order.
Answer:
Raising sheep in order to use their wool to make clothing
Explanation:
<u>Domesticated animals are the ones who can breed in captivity, who survive in various climates, and who have the benefit to the humans.</u> They have a different temperament than the wild animals – they are more tamed and mild, almost friendly, and have no natural need for the attack. By domestication, humans gained various resources for food, material, and survival in general.
<u>Sheep are domestic animals, and they have great benefits for people because of the wool. </u>People rise and breed sheep because wool is a great natural and warm material that is frequently used for making clothes.
<u>The other examples presented here feature wild animals that are not domesticated and the action that is not habituation of these animals but more likely violent action.</u>
Magna Carta was however novel in that it set up a formally recognised means of collectively coercing theKing<span>. ... The </span>barons<span> were trying to </span>force John<span> to keep to the charter, but clause 61 was so heavily weighted against the </span>King<span> that this version of the charter could not survive.</span>
