Mexican Texas<span> is the historiographical name used to refer to the era of </span>Texan<span> history between 1821 and 1836, </span>when it was part<span> of </span>Mexico<span>. </span>Mexico gained independence<span> from Spain in 1821 in </span>its war<span> of</span>independence<span>. Initially, </span>Mexican Texas<span> operated very similarly to Spanish </span>Texas<span>.</span>
Answer:
To calculate the theoretical yield, determine the number of moles of each reactant, in this case the sole reactant ethanol. Convert the 100 g to moles; the molecular weight of ethanol is 46 g/mole, therefore: Since there is only one reactant, it is also the limiting reagent.
Explanation:
IM SORRY I AM BUSY TO BUT PLEESE ALL I GOT RIGHT NOW
MAKE ME BRANLIEST
Using dimensional analysis, we can find the moles of strontium by comparing the mass of strontium to it's atomic mass.
You can find the atomic mass of Sr on the periodic table:
Atomic Mass Sr = 87.62g/mol
In case you are not familiar, dimensional analysis works like this:
(what we know) x (conversion factor) = what we are looking for
The conversion factor compares the units of what we know to the units of what we are looking for. In this case, the conversion factor is:
1 mol/87.62g
The important thing to note about the conversion factor is that you want to be able to cancel out the units of your given measurement (in this case, it is the mass)
So, our full solution will be:
moles Sr = (175.24 g)x(1 mol/87.62 g)
(cancel out the mass units)
moles Sr = 175.24 x 1 mol/87.62
= 2.00 mol Sr
Hope this helped you!
<span>Compounds are composed of different elements in a fixed proportions. For example, 1 atom of oxygen (O) combines with 2 atoms of hydrogen (H) to form one molecule of water (H2O) compound. Similarly other numbers of atoms would produce other chemical compounds. Even adding 1 more atom of oxygen would convert the water (H2O) into hydrogen peroxide(H2O2). Even if we were only to list the ones we know there are over 20 million known compounds.
In order to list all possible compounds such a table would rapidly become combinatoric nightmare of such size that it would not be practical to use even with a computer database and it would consist of over 100 billion possible compounds containing only H, C, O and N.
Creating a table to handle all possible elements would mean a table of many trillions of compounds.</span>
