Answer:
θ = 36.2º
Explanation:
When light passes through a polarizer it becomes polarized and if it then passes through a second polarizer, it must comply with Malus's law
I = I₀ cos² tea
The non-polarized light between the first polarized of this leaves half the intensity, with vertical polarization
I₁ = I₀ / 2
I₁ = 845/2
I₁ = 422.5 W / m²
In this case, the incident light in the second polarizer has an intensity of I₁ = 422.5 W / m² and the light that passes through the polarizer has a value of
I = 275 W / m
²
Cos² θ = I / I₁
Cos θ = √ I / I₁
Cos θ = √ (275 / 422.5)
Cos θ = 0.80678
θ = cos⁻¹ 0.80678
θ = 36.2º
This is the angle between the two polarizers
Answer:
E) d/sqrt2
Explanation:
The initial electric force between the two charge is given by:
where
k is the Coulomb's constant
q1, q2 are the two charges
d is the separation between the two charges
We can also rewrite it as
So if we want to make the force F twice as strong,
F' = 2F
the new distance between the charges would be
so the correct option is E.
I wanna say its ture but it didnt exactly say that is transfered from those types of energy so I would just say false
Answer:
l these errors believe that the speed of the system is less than that calculated
Explanation:
When we carry out any measurement in addition to the magnitude, the sources of uncertainty must also be analyzed.
We can have random uncertainties, correspondin
g to momentary errors, for example early warps during medicine, parallax errors, errors in the starting and ending points of the movement; I mean every possible random error. This error is the one that is analyzed and calculated in the statistical equations
There is another source of error, the systematic ones, these are much more complicated, they can be an error in the pendulum length, friction in the pendulum movement mechanism, deformities in the support systems, this errors are not analyzed by the statistic, in general They discover by looking at the results and comparing with the tabulated or real ones.
tith the explanation we see that the errors described are systematic.
In general these errors believe that the speed of the system is less than that calculated
