To solve this exercise, we will first proceed to calculate the electric force given by the charge between the proton and the electron (it). From the Force we will use Newton's second law that will allow us to find the acceleration of objects. The Coulomb force between two charges is given as

Here,
k = Coulomb's constant
q = Charge of proton and electron
r = Distance
Replacing we have that,


The force between the electron and proton is calculated. From Newton's third law the force exerted by the electron on proton is same as the force exerted by the proton on electron.
The acceleration of the electron is given as



The acceleration of the proton is given as,



The answer is number 1 solar panels
To protect the constitutional right to confront ones accused
If the beam is in static equilibrium, meaning the Net Torque on it about the support is zero, the value of x₁ is 2.46m
Given the data in the question;
- Length of the massless beam;

- Distance of support from the left end;

- First mass;

- Distance of beam from the left end( m₁ is attached to );

- Second mass;

- Distance of beam from the right of the support( m₂ is attached to );

Now, since it is mentioned that the beam is in static equilibrium, the Net Torque on it about the support must be zero.
Hence, 
we divide both sides by 

Next, we make
, the subject of the formula
![x_1 = x - [ \frac{m_2x_2}{m_1} ]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=x_1%20%3D%20x%20-%20%5B%20%5Cfrac%7Bm_2x_2%7D%7Bm_1%7D%20%5D)
We substitute in our given values
![x_1 = 3.00m - [ \frac{61.7kg\ * \ 0.273m}{31.3kg} ]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=x_1%20%3D%203.00m%20-%20%5B%20%5Cfrac%7B61.7kg%5C%20%2A%20%5C%200.273m%7D%7B31.3kg%7D%20%5D)


Therefore, If the beam is in static equilibrium, meaning the Net Torque on it about the support is zero, the value of x₁ is 2.46m
Learn more; brainly.com/question/3882839
I think the correct answer would be that Charles' law explains why <span>a balloon deflates when the air around it cools. Charles' law is a simplification of the ideal gas law. At constant pressure, volume and temperature have a direct relationship. Hope this helps.</span>