Answer:
C. The motor tasks performed in the experiment were too simple.
On this case is the best option since the student wants to explain the effect of motor imagery and action observation together into the excitability. And maybe is too simple, since we need to cover other possibilities in order to analyze the excitability.
Explanation:
A. The procedure used did not include MEP recordings prior to each task.
Not true, is not a requisite record MEP prior to the task to evaluate the variable of interest on this case.
B. MEP amplitudes in an individual are typically highly consistent.
The Motor evoked potentials (MEP) "are electrical signals recorded from neural tissue or muscle after activation of central motor pathways". But on this case that's a technical aspect related to the topic and this not would be the reason why we need to withhold the presentation
C. The motor tasks performed in the experiment were too simple.
On this case is the best option since the student wants to explain the effect of motor imagery and action observation together into the excitability. And maybe is too simple, since we need to cover other possibilities in order to analyze the excitability.
D. The six different conditions were run in random order.
That's not true the student are not analyzing 6 different conditions, just 2.
Answer:


Explanation:
d = Gap between slits = 0.142 mm
= Wavelength of light = 576 nm
L = Distance between light and screen = 3.5 m
m = Order = 2
Difference in path length is given by

The difference in path lengths is 
For dark fringe the difference in path length is given by

The difference in path length is 
Answer:

Explanation:
Given that

As both charges are negative so there exist force of repulsion in direction as shown in figure.

Angle at which force F12 is acting is



Force exerted on charge -2e is equal in magnitude to F12 but is in opposite direction


<span>Circumference = 2 * pi * r
62.8318 = 2 * 3.14159 * 10 cm
62.8318 * 15 rotations / 42 seconds = 22.44 cm / second
22.44 cm / 100 cm per meter = .2244 m / s</span>
Answer:
Part a)

Part b)

Part C)

Part d)
Due to large magnitude of friction between road and the car the momentum conservation may not be valid here as momentum conservation is valid only when external force on the system is zero.
Explanation:
Part a)
As we know that car A moves by distance 6.1 m after collision under the frictional force
so the deceleration due to friction is given as



now we will have




Part b)
Similarly for car B the distance of stop is given as 4.4 m
so we will have


Part C)
By momentum conservation we will have



Part d)
Due to large magnitude of friction between road and the car the momentum conservation may not be valid here as momentum conservation is valid only when external force on the system is zero.