Answer:
A. 2
hope this helps :)
if you need an explanation let me know!!
C. Developing effective methods of food preservation
Explanation:
The development of effective methods of food preservation is a much more smaller and manageable problem that contributes to the complex problem.
The percentage of food rotting is not as a result of lack of an effective preservation technique as highlighted in the passage. It is due to the long distances of agricultural area from where the farms are located.
- To cut the loss, efficient and rapid transportation techniques needs to be put in place to carry the fruits and vegetables to the area where they are needed.
- This is the most complex problem that if solved can peg back food rot.
- Additional measures should be put in place to preserve the food.
Other options does not address the subject matter
learn more:
Preservation brainly.com/question/4853419
#learnwithBrainly
The first statement (Matter is neither created nor destroyed) is correct.
The second statement would violate the law of conservation of mass (I will refer to this as LCM), as it would mean matter can "flow" into the universe, but not out, meaning the total matter will never be less than it was before.
The third statement violates LCM because it means matter is created during a reaction, which is not true.
The last statement violates LCM because it means matter is lost during a reaction, which is not true.
Answer:
iron sulfate
Explanation:
Electrostatic attraction as bonds between ions is characteristic of the electrovalent bond or the ionic bond
In this type of bond, there is electron transfer from one atom to another. The atom that looses electrons become positively charged while the atom that gains electrons becomes negatively charged.
In iron sulfate, there is electrostatic attraction between Fe II ions and sulphate ions, making iron sulfate an ionic compound.
